archive
Spam is not protected speech
Submitted by matthew on Thu, 04/10/2008 - 21:43.The case: e360 vs. Comcast.
Judge James B. Zagel issued a landmark summary judgment against notorious spammer, e360. Basic findings in his "you have no case" dismissal: spam is not protected free speech. Filtering spam is not tortious interference in business. Filtering spam is normal, everyday business practice and e360's spamming campaigns deserve to be blocked under the Communications Decency Act.
The Sad Economic Truth
Submitted by matthew on Fri, 04/11/2008 - 09:12.In my inbox this morning, I ran across an article relating the sad economic truth regarding stay-at-home parents in What's a Homemaker Worth? The Shocking Truth." on MSN.com.


