A Gator By Any Other Name

Gator is changing their name to Claria (see A Gator By Any Other Name [Slashdot] ). So, this means that a bottom-feeding, scum-sucking product will change from a somewhat reasonable moniker that implies a carnivorous, mud-dwelling reptile to a name that means… nothing. Sounds sort of like Claritin, like “oh, yeah, my computer is going to have freed-up nasal passages because this software is on it”.

What a load of horse manure.

I remember when Amway changed their operating name from Amway to Quixtar. Same company, but they had a bad reputation with one name, so they changed the name they operated under (note: it’s still Amway under the hood).

Gator is changing their name to Claria (see A Gator By Any Other Name [Slashdot] ). So, this means that a bottom-feeding, scum-sucking product will change from a somewhat reasonable moniker that implies a carnivorous, mud-dwelling reptile to a name that means… nothing. Sounds sort of like Claritin, like “oh, yeah, my computer is going to have freed-up nasal passages because this software is on it”.

What a load of horse manure.

I remember when Amway changed their operating name from Amway to Quixtar. Same company, but they had a bad reputation with one name, so they changed the name they operated under (note: it’s still Amway under the hood).

A name is who you are, and in the real world, for real people, it’s an intense decision to figure out if you want to change your name. It’s often in response to some trauma, and it is both an intensely personal and difficult decision.

There are at least two classes of people for whom operating under a different name is their modus operandi; these individuals find it easy to adopt another personality to avoid their more shadowy endeavors.

Career criminals. And superheroes in comic books.

Gator has a history of being obnoxious spyware/adware that tells them where you’re going and what you’re doing on your computer. They sell this information to others. While this isn’t illegal, I consider it completely unethical. Yet, because some user clicked “OK” at some point to an EULA they didn’t read, Gator/Claria considers it their privilege to indiscriminately rape and harvest that user’s private information for sale to the highest bidder.

I guess in this case, corporations that change their name easily and individuals that change their name easily have a lot in common. And Gator/Claria sure as hell is no superhero.

Ethics vs. Morals

I received a note from my buddy, Sam Graber, regarding my comment to this post where I
described the difference between ethics and morals from my point of
view.

I’ve received some feedback from other people on the topic as well
via email, researched it a bit myself, and I thought I’d share with you
what I’ve found.

I received a note from my buddy, Sam Graber, regarding my comment to this post where I described the difference between ethics and morals from my point of view.

I’ve received some feedback from other people on the topic as well via email, researched it a bit myself, and I thought I’d share with you what I’ve found.

There’s a great discussion over at wikipedia.org about this very thing. And, from what I’ve read elsewhere, it seems as if people are all over the map regarding ethics and morals, particularly on their semantics.

There are many “loaded” words in the English Language; here are just a few I run across weekly, at least:

  • cult: most often used when discussing a religion one doesn’t like, this word also has specific meaning to many individuals for only certain patterns of behavior.
  • geek: this term had a terribly negative connotation when I was a child. These days, even marketing wonks often refer to themselves as geeks.
  • evolution: this is a particularly touchy one. If you’re talking to someone who supports evolution, they are generally referring to natural and/or artificial selection, the proven fact that reinforcement of certain genetic traits happens in response to natural or artificial selective pressures. However, if you are talking to a Creationist, often they are referring to abiogenesis, or the creation of life from non-life.

So, back to ethics versus morals. The two words are not necessarily synonymous, and because of the historical impreciseness of common usage, it’s helpful to distinguish what makes one different from the other (thanks to the Wikipedia entry for some of this information):

  • The root word for Ethical is the Greek “ethos,” meaning “character.”
  • The root word for Moral is Latin “mos,” meaning “custom.”

So, from where I sit, it appears that ethics are derived from your individual character, while morals are derived from custom, or tradition. I’ll broadly define “custom” here to include commandments, religious tenets, and society’s laws. As a study for myself in what ethical but amoral behavior entails, let’s take a look at the Ten Commandments. There are several variations on The Ten Commandments in the Old Testament of the Bible, but for brevity I’ll choose the shortened forms as are commonly found on wall-plaques and such.

  1. You will have no other gods before God.  This seems pretty straightforward custom (morals) to me, rather than anything to do with one’s character. Also rather self-serving, and difficult to enforce, since even Christians cannot seem to agree on who their God is.
  2. EDIT by matthew: This is the one I missed!  You will not worship any “graven images”, or idols. This seems to have little ethical basis (by my perspective on ethics for the purpose of this essay), besides perhaps avoiding undue emphasis on materialism. Some today redefine this as a caution to avoid over-emphasis on the “worship”, or veneration, of any material thing. They speak of the metaphorical “bowing down” to money, sports, power, or any other pursuit that keeps one’s focus off Deity. Does this derive from custom (morality) or ethics? I have difficulty seeing how an edict against making idols could have a purely ethical basis, but the more general principal of avoiding obsession with material goods can very well be an ethical principal.
  3. You will not take the name of God in vain. Now, this is an interesting one that I think can be approached from two angles. If you were to take the name of someone’s god in vain, aren’t there social repercussions of so doing? Could one form an ethical rule in one’s character here? “I would rather not have someone insult my concept of God, therefore I will not insult their concept of God.” Or, for those of us without a concept of God, “I would not wish my beliefs insulted, possibly causing violent behavior, therefore I will not insult someone else’s beliefs.” This seems to be a pretty good Golden-Rule based moral AND ethical commandment.
  4. You will keep the Sabbath Day holy. I’m undecided on this one. Ethically, taking a day off once per week is probably a sound choice for one’s mental and physical health. If God is specifically saying Saturday is the Sabbath, at that point it seems to become custom rather than character-based. This is quite a semantic difficulty, as well, because Christians tend to celebrate the Sabbath on Sunday, while Jews and Eastern Orthodox (if I recall correctly) celebrate it on the traditional Friday evening through Saturday evening.
    I remember fondly Sam’s mother preparing for Jewish festivals on Friday nights by singing some hymns I couldn’t understand, and lighting a candle before we broke bread together. It was always in the evening, and her custom brings a smile to my face to this day.

  5. Honor your father and mother, that your days may be long on the earth.  This seems to be a very straightforward threat, to me, with some question as to what is meant by the term “honor”. If it means “obey”, I see little ethical or logical reason to follow this commandment. Obeying someone else’s commands, rather than your own conscience, is what leads regularly to personal ruin. If, instead, “honor” means to speak respectfully of them, and give their opinions weight, it may be wise council with an ethical basis: treating them as you would wish to be treated.
  6. You will not murder other human beings.  I intentionally manipulated the wording here. Taken at face value, “thou shalt not kill” would be an impossible commandment to live fully, because we kill microorganisms constantly in our bodies, and rely on plants and animals for food. However, the proscription against murdering fellow human beings seems an ethically sound principle: I do not murder, because I do not wish to be murdered.

    There’s so much more, though, that each character has to work out for himself. War. Self-Defense. Pre-Emptive strike. Abortion. Defense of others. Accident. Famine. Plague. Many of these are preventable. Our custom in this country is largely to take care of our own through social programs, and we consider this moral behavior. Yet we leave millions to die from HIV and related infections in Africa. Do we not help because we have insufficient means to do so? Because we don’t care? Because some priorities are higher than others? Is there an ethical difference between potential life, and life?

    The exciting thing for me is that we’re left to define these areas for ourselves. And on some of these tougher ethical questions, as evidenced by the pro-life/pro-choice debate of the last half-century, it’s a hairy business, indeed.

    Life and death seems, from my point of view, a natural phenomenon. We kill millions of our own body cells in a year. Only one sperm gets through to an egg, leaving the rest to die. Any line in the sand regarding this question is, of necessity, an arbitrary measure — a custom, a moral. Ethics doesn’t seem to have much to say on the questions of life and death.

  7. You will not commit adultery.  This seems to be a commandment with both moral and ethical ramifications. If one has pledged fidelity to a partner, one is obligated to honor that contract — on one’s character. If one has not done so, then if you don’t take the moral hard line, you must examine the ramifications of the action. Will it hurt someone else? Is it consensual? Will it result in unwanted pregnancy? Sexually transmitted diseases? Trauma to those around you due to moral considerations?

    From my own sense of personal ethics, it seems as if this custom evolved largely due to the questions above. Now that it is within the power of individuals to minimize the risk, is it worth the risk for them? As for me, I take my marriage contract very seriously, and have no wish to breach it.

  8. You will not steal.  Ethical. Straightforward, flowing from a Golden-Rule basis.
  9. You will not lie (bear false witness).  Once again, ethical.
  10. You will not covet.  This one is kind of weird on context. The Old Testament writers showed their predispositions by including a wife in with ox, ass, and other possessions — a position I think is not ethical at all, but was customary at the time. Another way to put it might be “You will not ‘keep up with the Joneses'” — which has a sound ethical basis in living within one’s means to avoid difficulty in life.

Ultimately, it sure looks to me like the Ten Commandments was a bit hit-and-miss on ethical questions. If it were narrowed down to six or so, it might be a better “ethical primer”. What do you think?

Quick disclaimer: I wrote this on my lunch break today. It’s not been proofread, really, so I reserve the right to change what I said if something came out wrong!

Barnson.org changes…

There are a few news tidbits, housekeeping, etc. regarding barnson.org. Read on if you’re interested in technical esotera…

There are a few news tidbits, housekeeping, etc. regarding barnson.org. Read on if you’re interested in technical esotera…

  1. Move to a new server. Yep, I’m relocating again. This time, it’s to a faster machine with more hard disk space, so it should be all good.
  2. Turned off anonymous posting. Due to a few idiot spammers posting advertisements anonymously to many weblogs, I set it up so that although you can post a comment anonymously, it gets sent to a submission queue — meaning that if it doesn’t pass my review, it doesn’t show up. This means I end up seeing the ads so you don’t have to! I’m scared for what this means for the future of weblogging, though, that these robots go out and try to post to a bunch of weblogs to pump the Google rating of porn sites. But, as far as you’re concerned, it means if you post while anon, rather than using your login, you’ll have to wait until the next time I log on to see the comment. Spammers suck.
  3. Enabled the “scheduler” module. This entry, for instance, is scheduled to show up tomorrow (Tuesday), although I’ve written it today (Monday). This allows people to say when they want their post to show up, and when (if) they want it retracted. It’s not perfect, but it is serviceable and beats me changing dates on things to a few hours in the future when I want it to show up tomorrow morning rather than now… Anyway, this one probably won’t affect you, but if you notice posts going up, like, while I’m on vacation or something, you’ll know what I’ve done 🙂 Drupal rocks for weblogging.

That’s about it. Thanks for visiting!

barnson.org back up!

After a brief downtime due to a move, if you’re seeing this blog entry, barnson.org is back up again. Thanks for your patience!

After a brief downtime due to a move, if you’re seeing this blog entry, barnson.org is back up again. Thanks for your patience!

BARE NAKED LADIES SOLVE COPYRIGHT PROBLEMS!

Now, there is a headline you don’t see every day, eh?

Here’s the deal. For a long time we have debated the question of copyright law and music downloading and the ways to stop it. An assertion I have made for a long time has been that the music industry needs to go the way of the motion picture industry (via DVD’s), and make it so simply downloading songs doesn’t give you the whole album experience.

So, the other day, i went to pick up the newest album by my favorite band (and the most versatile band since the Beatles for my money), Barenaked Ladies. The name of the album was “Everything for Everyone”, and as I went to purchase my 15 dollar album, I noticed the album in different packaging for 20 dollars. Looking at the album, I noticed the difference.

Now, there is a headline you don’t see every day, eh?

Here’s the deal. For a long time we have debated the question of copyright law and music downloading and the ways to stop it. An assertion I have made for a long time has been that the music industry needs to go the way of the motion picture industry (via DVD’s), and make it so simply downloading songs doesn’t give you the whole album experience.

So, the other day, i went to pick up the newest album by my favorite band (and the most versatile band since the Beatles for my money), Barenaked Ladies. The name of the album was “Everything for Everyone”, and as I went to purchase my 15 dollar album, I noticed the album in different packaging for 20 dollars. Looking at the album, I noticed the difference.

Included in the second package was a second disc, a DVD to be played on a home theatre, with the album in 5.1 surround sound. 11 tracks of the album available in 5.1 surround and acoustic versions, DVD video of the band recording the acoustic tracks, behind the scenes video and an extra music track.

I promptly purchased my 20 dollar copy and brought it home to enjoy on my home theatre system. The point is this: The band does ask its listener to buy and not download. But the band doesn’t join the Lars Ulrichs and Dr. Dres of the world by suing the listeners, and inadvertently alienating the fans. This band offers a package that is worth buying, in the same way that the movie industry maked DVDs worth buying, with extras, commentaries, and an onslaught of extras that go beyond the main feature.

Oh.. and the album rocks my friggin world. 20 bucks well spent.

Understanding core motivations

Christy and I are busily reading “The Color Code”, by Dr. Taylor Hartman. This book is amazingly illuminating for me — I’m realizing that my attributes are not uniquely mine (plusses as well as minusses), but that they can be easily categorized and from that point I can figure out what positive and negative traits from other personality types I have.

Dr. Hartman has a “personality profile” test that one takes to begin reading the book. After taking it, most people have attributes from each of the four “primary colors”, since personalities are a rainbow of different attributes, but nevertheless one will generally win out. He has you take the test according to your earliest memory of yourself, rather than the way you are now, which definitely skewed my results heavily in one direction; that direction, though, helped me isolate which color I am.

Christy and I are busily reading “The Color Code”, by Dr. Taylor Hartman. This book is amazingly illuminating for me — I’m realizing that my attributes are not uniquely mine (plusses as well as minusses), but that they can be easily categorized and from that point I can figure out what positive and negative traits from other personality types I have.

Dr. Hartman has a “personality profile” test that one takes to begin reading the book. After taking it, most people have attributes from each of the four “primary colors”, since personalities are a rainbow of different attributes, but nevertheless one will generally win out. He has you take the test according to your earliest memory of yourself, rather than the way you are now, which definitely skewed my results heavily in one direction; that direction, though, helped me isolate which color I am.

The amazing thing to me about this approach to understanding one’s own psychology is that in taking this profile exam, you cut through the layers of bullcrap regarding birth order, sex, upbringing, and so forth. The classic “Myers-Briggs” personality profiling is less relevant too, because those talk more about thought patterns, how you relate to the world, and not the thing Dr. Hartman calls “Core Motive”.

The core motive is, fundamentally, what’s most important to you. There’s a whole lot more to it than this, but the quick summary from what I gather:

  • Red: Power, productivity, leadership
  • Blue: Altruism, intimacy, loyalty
  • White: Peace, kindness, independence
  • Yellow: Fun, popularity, action

Hmm, take a guess which one you are, then I’ll share mine.

Ready?

The picture of me on the right as of the day I posted it — my “avatar” — says it all.

I’m yellow. I mean, ALL yellow. When I took the exam, compared to my wife’s scores, I was so yellow it would be like squinting at the sun. However, I have many of the negative personality characteristics of other colors, with few of the positives. I think I know where that comes from, too — trying to be somebody I’m not for the last thirteen years.

Christy turned out to be a Blue, with a strong component of Red in there as well. Hartman provides an enlightening comment about the Blue/Red combination:

The most difficult color combination within one individual is the mixture of Red and Blue. If you are strong in both categories, you will often find yourself stepping on someone’s toes to get a task completed (Red), but feeling guilty afterward for making that person unhappy (Blue).

We’re not through the book yet, but I heartily recommend reading it, particularly reading it with your spouse. I hate to admit it, but I skipped ahead to Yellows (we’re still reading about Blues tonight, having just barely finished Reds). It’s really, really hard admitting some of the negative characteristics, but oh my golly do I have those in spades, too. And realizing they are simply an innate part of my personality, rather than some fearful force to fight against, suddenly is liberating and makes me more willing to be a whole me.

I’ve been a Yellow trying to be a combination of Blue, Red, and White for too long. So many of the attributes taught both in my church and in employment or social circles as “desirable” attributes turn out to be core attributes of entirely different personalities: Harmonious, disciplined, or serious are attributes of White, Red, and Blue.

None of them are me. And realizing I don’t have to aspire to be like something I’m not… it’s like opening the blinds and curtains after a long winter. Time to embrace the core me a bit more I think.

Yellow Personalities

Strengths

  • Highly optimistic
  • Likes self and accepts others easily
  • Loves to volunteer for opportunities
  • Sees life as an experience to be enjoyed
  • Flashy and spunky (race horse rather than plow horse)
  • Adventurous and daring

Weaknesses

  • Irresponsible and unreliable
  • Self-centered and egotistical
  • Flighty and inconsistent
  • Lots of talk with little action
  • Superficial and mostly interested in a good time
  • Unwilling to experience pain in order to produce quality
  • Undisciplined
  • Loud and obnoxious in public places
  • Needs to look good socially
  • Unable to confront issues

Relationships with a Yellow

Do:

  • Be Positive
  • Adore them
  • Touch them physically
  • Accept their playful teasing
  • Remember they are tender
  • Praise them
  • Remember they hold feelings deeply
  • Promote playful activities for and with them
  • Enjoy their charismatic innocence
  • Allow them opportunity for verbal expression

Don’t:

  • Be too serious or sober in criticism
  • Push them too intensely
  • Ignore them
  • Forget they have “down” times also
  • Demand perfection
  • Expect them to dwell on problems
  • Give them too much rope or they may hang themselves
  • Classify them as just lightweight social butterflies
  • Attack their sensitivity
  • Totally control their schedules

Apparently, I’m in the same camp with Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and Elvis Presley as far as core personality (or, apparent core personality). Both Ronny and Bill have very, very Red wives though — and Elvis did not. Maybe that was the cause of his flame-out. Anyway, lots of cool tips for handling one’s own personality and being able to be productive despite being “the way I am”.

One thing that really really stuck out to me in the description of Yellows, is that we have a hard time sticking to a job. We get bored easily, and frequently end up in lots of different jobs simply because, although the job may remain interesting, we quickly become disenchanted and lose interest in it. That sounds an awful, awful, awful lot like me. Seven “real” jobs in nine years? Time to settle down this time, hombre, and give a hard look at perhaps finding a job where I can continue to remain interested in it.

Postfix in a FreeBSD jail

I recently ran into problems with postfix running inside of a FreeBSD jail. It would constantly report “file too large” errors, and other errors in that vein. Since there appears to be no documentation for FreeBSD “newbies” on fixing this problem, it seems like most people default back to sendmail or exim, rather than using the excellent Postfix MTA on their virtual file systems.

I love postfix, so that is a situation I’d like to change! Here are the directions on how to get postfix working inside a FreeBSD “jail” system.

Well, the basic problem with Postfix in a FreeBSD 4.8 jail is the disconnect in the setrlimit() call in Postfix versus the kernel. You end up with spurious “file too large” errors when sending and receiving messages, which just sucks.

I recently ran into problems with postfix running inside of a FreeBSD jail. It would constantly report “file too large” errors, and other errors in that vein. Since there appears to be no documentation for FreeBSD “newbies” on fixing this problem, it seems like most people default back to sendmail or exim, rather than using the excellent Postfix MTA on their virtual file systems.

I love postfix, so that is a situation I’d like to change! Here are the directions on how to get postfix working inside a FreeBSD “jail” system.

Well, the basic problem with Postfix in a FreeBSD 4.8 jail is the disconnect in the setrlimit() call in Postfix versus the kernel. You end up with spurious “file too large” errors when sending and receiving messages, which just sucks.

There’s a patch at http://www.kozubik.com/published/misc/postfix_patch_fbsd45jail

Here’s how I do this without using the above patch:

IMPORTANT NOTE: A generous reader left a clarification in a comment below this entry that may be more useful for you. My procedure works fine because you’re running “make clean” inside the postfix work directory — using Postfix’s built-in Makefile — and thus not destroying the source file you’re going to edit. However, running “make clean” from the /usr/ports/mail/postfix-current/ directory would blow away your work/ directory, nullifying the effort you’re putting into patching 🙂

1. cd usr/ports/mail/postfix-current

2. Run “make” — I normally just leave it alone and let Postfix go ahead and build itself. Not a big deal.

3. cd work/postfix-(version)/src/util

4. using your favorite text editor, open “file_limit.c”, and go to the SECOND instance of this line:

struct rlimit rlim;

(This is the one followed by “rlim.rlim_cur = rlim.rlim_max = limit;” — if you don’t see that, you’re at the wrong one)

5. Paste this line immediately after the “struct rlimit rlim” declaration, then save and exit:

limit = RLIM_INFINITY;

6. Now cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix-current/work/postfix-(version) again.

7. run “make clean”

8. run “make”

9. cd ../.. (or /usr/ports/mail/postfix-current)

10. If you’ve already installed postfix, then run “postfix stop” and “make deinstall”. Otherwise, just run “make” and then “make install” and YOU ARE DONE!

Announcing a new feature: Barnson.org recipes!

I decided that I’m finally sick of hunting through my cabinets for our family recipes, and that I wanted a place to put them that’s always available — even barring a move or a fire or whatever.

I decided that I may as well set it up so that any registered user of the site can add their favorite recipes, too. So if you have a few to swap, just log in on the right-hand side (or create an account, if you haven’t already), and post a few favorite recipes!

Without further ado, here’s my first one, for our family’s Favorite Rice Pudding! (Named after Kirsten Favorite, now Smith, of course!)

Add comments to the recipe, please, not this blog posting 🙂

I decided that I’m finally sick of hunting through my cabinets for our family recipes, and that I wanted a place to put them that’s always available — even barring a move or a fire or whatever.

I decided that I may as well set it up so that any registered user of the site can add their favorite recipes, too. So if you have a few to swap, just log in on the right-hand side (or create an account, if you haven’t already), and post a few favorite recipes!

Without further ado, here’s my first one, for our family’s Favorite Rice Pudding! (Named after Kirsten Favorite, now Smith, of course!)

Add comments to the recipe, please, not this blog posting 🙂

The Root Canal

“Matt, I’m going to make your tooth cold. I need you to raise your hand when it feels cold. Then rub your tongue over the tooth, and tell me when it feels normal again.”

Dr. Aaron Stobbe, my dentist, held an ice-cold Q-tip against one of my teeth. Within three seconds, I raised my arm, and after he removed the Q-tip, lowered it again about fives seconds later.

“Good, that’s a normal tooth,” he informed me.

Now the second tooth, immediately behind the one that was feeling some pressure sensitivity. Again, within three seconds, my arm was up, then down about five seconds later.

“Another normal tooth. Now let’s check out the one that’s having problems,” Dr. Stobbe said.

“Matt, I’m going to make your tooth cold. I need you to raise your hand when it feels cold. Then rub your tongue over the tooth, and tell me when it feels normal again.”

Dr. Aaron Stobbe, my dentist, held an ice-cold Q-tip against one of my teeth. Within three seconds, I raised my arm, and after he removed the Q-tip, lowered it again about fives seconds later.

“Good, that’s a normal tooth,” he informed me.

Now the second tooth, immediately behind the one that was feeling some pressure sensitivity. Again, within three seconds, my arm was up, then down about five seconds later.

“Another normal tooth. Now let’s check out the one that’s having problems,” Dr. Stobbe said.

He held the Q-tip against my tooth. And we waited.

And waited.

And waited.

After about fifteen seconds, he explained to me that this test told him that the nerve inside this tooth is probably dead. X-Rays were inconclusive, but the cold-test was: an earlier filling had led to the death of the root.

I would need A ROOT CANAL!

“Well, we have some time right now, if you like,” Dr. Stobbe said, “we can always skip lunch”.

“Sounds good to me!” I responded, and sat back in the chair.

Now, according to Aaron Stobbe, for root canals they usually use a “Dental Dam”. This is a piece of rubber stretched over a frame to isolate a tooth from the rest of the teeth. But since the tooth was obviously already infected and dead, there was little need. He numbed me up (including a shot to the roof of my mouth that stung rather painfully), and then began the drilling.

Those of you who have had fillings before know what this is like. Really, at this point in my life, thirty years old, it’s not nearly as traumatic as it used to be. No big deal.

But something was different this time. He went deeper. And suddenly, my mouth and nose were filled with the most disgusting flavor I’d ever encountered. However, I knew it well.

“‘at hells like ro’en hotatos!” I exclaimed past his fingers.

“That smells like rotten potatos, huh? Yeah, it’s pretty gross,” responded Dr. Stobbe. “I think I mentioned, though, that there is usually a little outgassing when we break through to the nerve.”

Then he began pulling out the files. Each file is about the size of a sewing needle, with a fat, round end about the width of your pinky to hold on to. He’d use each file for just a few seconds, then get a new one. He explained that these got down into the root of the tooth and scraped out all the gunk there.

Oy, veh, and gunk it was. That stink persisted the whole time. I mean, I’ve farted good in my time, and had some really ripe ones, so I know it’s possible for my body to contain some repulsive smells. But this was just beyond imaginable, a combination of rotting fish with rotting potatos and terrible intestinal distress. I found it hard to believe my tooth harbored such foulness.

Once all the files were done (which took about fifteen minutes), he inserted a long, bended needle with a syringe of yellowish liquid. He explained it was basically bleach, similar to that used on clothes, to help disinfect the tooth. Given the smell, that makes perfect sense to me… I wouldn’t want any of that cruddy stuff sticking around.

He finished up, after putting in the disinfectant, by capping it off with a soft Plaster-of-Paris like substance. He informed me this plug was just temporary, and he’d need to see me in two weeks to “build it up”. I scheduled the appointment on the way out, rinsed with a glass of water to attempt to clear the lingering taste/smell from my mouth, called my wife, and got a ride home.

Ahh, then yesterday. I hope this story is moderately entertaining for those of you who haven’t had a root canal!

Yesterday I saw the dentist again. This time, they used the Dental Dam because it is most important that no germs make it down into the tooth. It was actually kind of cool, like a little Dream Catcher made of rubber… well, OK, there are no holes or anything, but I could kind of talk around it. I also opted for the Bite Blocker, a piece of plastic to wedge my mouth open, because holding my mouth open for that long aggravates my Trigeminal Neuralgia horribly.

He broke out the drill to break up the Plaster-of-Paris-type stuff, then used some more files to scrape out lingering bits of nerve ending and fluff from down inside the tooth canals. There was only the slightest pain this time, other than that annoying “shoot the roof of your mouth” novacaine. Again he flushed it out with the bleach-like solution.

Now, this time, after filing and cleaning, he used tweezers and these tiny strips of paper. According to him, he needed to dry the inside of those canals for the next step. The next step was to inject a type of rubber into the canals. After he’d pump some in there, he’d use a sharp metal tool to push and spread the rubber more, then chop off the exposed lumps of rubber. I wish I could have watched 🙂

Once the rubber was in the canals, the rest of the operation was very much like your basic filling: pump in some filling material, use a little ultraviolet light to cure it, pump in some more, cure it, and more, cure it. Then, finally, he ground down the epoxy-like stuff to more closely resemble a tooth (I really have trouble seeing the difference, except that a dentist’s work now is a bit “smoother” than a natural tooth), had me bite on the test strip to make sure my bite was even, ground a little more, and said “have a nice day!”

Total price: $650.

A root canal definitely wasn’t the hellish ordeal I thought it would be. It’s no picnic, but the second half of the procedure was peaceful enough that, actually, I fell asleep partway through it! I woke myself up because I was snoring!

I’m going to remember the “cold test”, though. I think I may have a second tooth, that also had a “deep filling” that may have damaged the root, which may require the same treatment. This time, because so much of the tooth was saved, there was no need for a cap according to my dentist. We’ll see how it goes I guess!

Movie Lists.. FUN FOR ALL!!

Well, the fall movie season has begun.. and it leads so quickly to the Christmas movie season, that I now bunch it all together into one block. So..

Someone, somewhere discovered that this season could be the OTHER movie seaosn, stealing the summer’s thunder. Because of this, we are facing the onslaught of films that used to be reserved for summe, and in honor of that, I have decided to compile a few top 5 lists of movies, and I invite you to do the same… READ MORE BELOW!!

Well, the fall movie season has begun.. and it leads so quickly to the Christmas movie season, that I now bunch it all together into one block. So..

Someone, somewhere discovered that this season could be the OTHER movie seaosn, stealing the summer’s thunder. Because of this, we are facing the onslaught of films that used to be reserved for summe, and in honor of that, I have decided to compile a few top 5 lists of movies, and I invite you to do the same… READ MORE BELOW!! ‘

These are all personal choices Top 5 most anticipated 2003 Fall Flicks 1. Lord Of The Rings: Return of the King 2. The Matrix Revolutions 3. Kill Bill vol. 1 4. The Last Samurai 5. Elf

Top 5 Best Summer Movies 2003 1. X2: X-Men United 2. Freddy Vs. Jason 3. Once Upon a Time in Mexico 4. Bruce Almighty 5. Pirates Of The Carribbean (Did not see Finding Nemo, but I was told it would be on here if I had)

Top 5 Biggest Disappointments Summer 2003 1. Hulk 2. Charlie’s Angels 2 3. Matrix Reloaded (But cool enough ending to make me want the 3rd to redeem it) 4. Hollywood Homicide (C’mon Harrison..) 5. LXG (I didn’t actually see this, but I wanted to until the TERRIBLE reviews)

Top 5 Favorite movies of All time 1. The Empire Strikes Back 2. The Abyss: Speacial Edition 3. Good Will Hunting 4. Kung Pow: Enter the fist 5. Bruce Campbell vs. Army Of Darkness

Top 5 BEST trilogies 1. Star Wars (1st Trilogy) 2. Lord Of The Rings 3. The Godfather (I liked 3) 4. Evil Dead 5. Terminator

Top 5 Favorite Scary movies 1. Nightmare On Elm Street 3 2. The Blair Witch Project 3. Poltergeist 4. Evil Dead 2 (I don’t know if this counts) 5. Silence Of the Lambs (and Red Dragon)

Top 5 Fave Comedies 1. Kung pow: Enter the Fist 2. Army Of Darkness (I Don’t know if this counts either) 3. Monty python and the Holy Grail 4. Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back 5. High Strung (Super early Jim Carrey and Steve Oedekerk comedy)

Top Sequels that were better than Originals 1: Empire Strikes Back 2. Godfather 2 3. Aliens 4. Desperado 5. Terminator 2: Judgment Day

Finally, top 5 Non Trilogy Series: 1. Star trek 2. Nightmare On Elm Street 3. James Bond 4. View Askew (Clerks through Jay and Bob) 5. Alien

So.. hows about you?