Yesterday afternoon, I heard news that Senators McCain and Clinton, two of the political candidates for President of the United States, supported a “vacation” from gasoline taxes from Memorial Day through Labor Day.
This is a bad idea.
- If we simply sacrifice $10B from the highway budget, as McCain recommends, the American consumer still pay the price in vehicles damaged by under-maintained highways. Or, if we instead transfer money from the “general fund” to pay for such a holiday, we’re adding more to the national deficit. Yep, let’s borrow imaginary money together.
- If we, as Clinton recommends, instead fund that $10B in “windfall profits” from oil companies benefiting from the enormous hike in gasoline prices over the past year, we are encouraging those companies to take a lesson from enormous defense-contractor Halliburton: De-list in the US, and list their companies in some other country with more friendly taxation policies.
- Didn’t either of these two politicians take basic economics? Oil prices rise during the summer due to increased demand. Refineries and distributors commonly experience shortages during the summer due to this seasonal demand peak in the largest gasoline-consumption market in the world. Many families reduce their usage during peak-demand times due to the high price of gas. If the price of gasoline drops 18.5c per gallon, demand will rise considerably, resulting in a much smaller break for the taxpayer, and a considerable profit increase for the gasoline vendor.
- The Highway Administration is already $3.4B short of what they need to keep US highways maintained. For every dollar spent by this particular administration, nearly $6 is generated in revenue by the use of the roads.
- Such a tax break does not address the fundamental issue behind rising gas prices, that all the candidates are conveniently ignoring: the value of the dollar has gone down tremendously in the past 18 months. Contrary to some government-paid analyst announcements, I don’t believe it’s due to “rampant speculation” on the dollar. Such a large shift — half the value of our currency — represents a fundamental money-policy change. The most logical explanation is that such a devalued dollar serves our national interests at the moment: increased exports, increased jobs, and easier repayment of the national debt.
This almost makes me want to make a break from my position of studied neutrality on the Democratic front and side with Senator Obama. (I oppose McCain principally on the basis that he has publicly stated his intention to “bomb Iran” if he takes office.) Obama is the only one of the three who seems to have the backbone to oppose such political pandering on economic grounds. He alone seems to graps the economic reality of such a “tax holiday” amounting only to a bump in profits for the gasoline vendors, shifting the burden of the cost either to the very consumers the policy is trying to help
Just like he was the sole US senator to oppose going to war with Iraq.
