How often do you think about the potential corollary to a statement you are making? A corollary is something that follows without requiring proof from a statement already proven, a deduction or inference, or a natural consequence or result. Does it even matter?
“I know I’m raising my kids right because they pray to Jesus every night.”
Is the corollary to that, “I know you aren’t raising your kids right because they don’t?”
As mad as it may make some die-hard anti-religionists out there, I’m going to say “No. The two have nothing to do with each other in the mind of reasonable people.”
I found myself thinking about corollaries today because I went to church. This is a somewhat rare occurence lately, and entirely by choice. Most of my friends and family (although not all unless they stumble across my blog) are aware that I’m actively non-theistic. I hesitate to use the word “atheist” because people assume that implies anti-religion, which I am not. I simply think that religion is irrelevant to my daily life, and has been for a very long time. Last August began letting my wife and close friends in on that fact.
Anyway, my daughter asked me to come because the “Primary” (an LDS church word for “babysitting and religious indoctrination for children 12 and under”) was going to be singing a couple of Father’s Day songs and she wanted to sing to me. I enjoyed the singing, and the winking glances sent my way by my daughter and son. I smiled and enjoyed their show of affection immensely.
The only unfortunate part is that I had to sit through some rather insufferable speeches. That’s part of the reason I stopped going, was simply that sitting through classes where they expect you to agree and not make waves when you disagree with the speaker’s opinion just doesn’t work for me. I’ve had people tell me that’s not true, and that the religion doesn’t discourage differing opinions when those opinions disagree with the official dogma. Try telling that to the Bishop who called me into his office to inform me that Church meetings were to be “faith-promoting”, and that my questions were not. Anyway, there were a couple statements that came from speakers that caught my attention:
“I’m so glad my child came to my husband and asked him to give her a Father’s Blessing. This shows that he’s a good father, and that I’m raising my children the right way.”
Is the corollary to that statement, “If my child doesn’t come to my husband and ask him for a Father’s Blessing, then he’s not a good father and I’m not raising my children the right way.”?
Initially, I thought so, and the only thing that kept me from being upset by the statement was once again reminding myself that, from the Latter-Day Saint perspective, even if I raise my children well, teach them to be moral and good people, spend time playing with them, help around the house, keep myself away from drugs, pornography, and other bad habits, and in every way try to set a good example for them, that’s not enough. Without “Temple” services, taking “sacrament”, participating in other “ordinances”, and avowing myself in front of two witnesses every two years to be free from sin (or at least as far as 14 questions can determine), I cannot ever measure up to the standard of a good father in the eyes of most Latter-Day Saints.
Once I remembered that, and that my perspective and the speaker’s perspective were completely different, I stopped being angry and began thinking about corollaries. If one assumes as fact that a God requires worship and supplication from His worshippers in order for them to be good fathers, then it follows that one who does not do that is a bad father. This is not an insult to the “bad father”, but a logical conclusion following from a completely different set of basic assumptions. Barring a dramatic opinion change on the part of the theist or non-theist, this gulf is quite difficult to cross.
Quite some time ago, I worked for a small company called “Talk2”. They were founded on the somewhat laughable proposition that internet-based speech-recognition technology would revolutionize the telephone industry, and they could make a fortune by so doing. They were partly right, but it’s turned out that voice services are just a small part of the standard suite of services with any cell phone these days. They’ve reinvented themselves as “Spontaneous Technologies”, and are focussing on VPN stuff now with maybe a dozen employees.
Anyway, a co-worker named Joel Hull, during one of our several religious discussions at work, made the statement one day that has stuck with me.
“Just because I think I’m right, doesn’t mean I think that you’re wrong.”
If we all approached life with this perspective, I think there would be fewer hard feelings and a lot more understanding in this world. I’m going to keep trying to remember this as I continue to explore Life Without Personal Religion.
I realize this is probably rather too intimate for a public forum, but a few months ago my wife and I had a discussion. She’s very actively Mormon. I’d been working very, very hard toward trying to be a better father and improving myself (exercise videos and all that), and I felt I’d made tremendous gains. In a late-night discussion, I asked her “Do you think I’m a better husband and father than I was back when I acted religiously?”
Her answer cut me to the core. “No,” she said. No explanation. I fumed, rolled over, and tried to go to sleep as that “No” echoed through my brain for hours.
The next day, she amended her statement of the night before. “In every way not involving religion, you are a better husband and father now than you were a year ago.” It felt lame, and too little too late, yet I’ve found that I can’t stop thinking about the statement for the last three months. It sent me into a bit of a downward, depressed spiral, thinking that my wife thought I was a worse husband and father, even when I practically bleeding out of the ears in my efforts to be one.
Now, I get it though. If your base assumption is that it’s impossible to be a good father without religion, then you’ll assume I’m a bad father for disavowing religion. My assumption is different — but it doesn’t make anybody else wrong. Now time to go be a good Dad.