The Moving Day 2007

Today is moving day. I spent many hours last night loading a twenty-six foot U-Haul truck with all of our stuff… It’s stacked to the ceiling, and this morning we get to unload it in sub-freezing temperatures.

So much for my plan to do nothing this week.

Today is moving day. I spent many hours last night loading a twenty-six foot U-Haul truck with all of our stuff… It’s stacked to the ceiling, and this morning we get to unload it in sub-freezing temperatures.

So much for my plan to do nothing this week.

Fully-assed

In keeping with my ongoing theme of “do as little as possible in the week after Christmas”, I bring you this quote. I have been reading a number of reviews and comparisons on various e-book readers in order to determine first if I want one, and second which one I’d prefer. Referring to a few half-assed programs on the Sony eBook reader, Nate Anderson had this to say:

In keeping with my ongoing theme of “do as little as possible in the week after Christmas”, I bring you this quote. I have been reading a number of reviews and comparisons on various e-book readers in order to determine first if I want one, and second which one I’d prefer. Referring to a few half-assed programs on the Sony eBook reader, Nate Anderson had this to say:

Let’s be clear: I would rather have these features than not have them, but it would have been nice to make them a bit more fully-assed.

The Joy Of Not Collecting Stamps

In keeping with this week’s theme of “I don’t want to be bothered writing omnibus blog entries”, I give you the following quote from Penn Jillette:

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

In keeping with this week’s theme of “I don’t want to be bothered writing omnibus blog entries”, I give you the following quote from Penn Jillette:

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

Batch converting shortcuts..

OKAY.. here’s a fun question.

I have an external hard drive. I have recently moved it from one computer to another. I want to use it as I always have.

The problem? I made a bunch of shortcuts to help me navigate around the drive, but now they all point to the wron drive.

On one computer the drive was F:. All my shortcuts say “F:/data/bla bla bla. On my new computer, the drive is K: and the shortcuts still say “F:/data/bla bla bla.” so each time, I have to redirect each shortcut to point to K, not F. Is there a one-step way to do this? I need the shortcuts to work, but don’t want to edit the LITERALLY hundreds of shortcuts manually.

OKAY.. here’s a fun question.

I have an external hard drive. I have recently moved it from one computer to another. I want to use it as I always have.

The problem? I made a bunch of shortcuts to help me navigate around the drive, but now they all point to the wron drive.

On one computer the drive was F:. All my shortcuts say “F:/data/bla bla bla. On my new computer, the drive is K: and the shortcuts still say “F:/data/bla bla bla.” so each time, I have to redirect each shortcut to point to K, not F. Is there a one-step way to do this? I need the shortcuts to work, but don’t want to edit the LITERALLY hundreds of shortcuts manually.

Thanks!

New World Order

http://www.informationliberation.com/?multimedia
Umm…okay, another startling bit of reality intrudes itself into our perceptions
please watch this movie… it’s kinda boring, but it has a lot of interesting facts bound up into it
It’s called ‘Zeitgeist’

and yah, I know a lot of people are going to think it’s a lot of tinfoil hat stuff, but so far all of the research I have done on them proved out to be true.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?multimedia Umm…okay, another startling bit of reality intrudes itself into our perceptions please watch this movie… it’s kinda boring, but it has a lot of interesting facts bound up into it It’s called ‘Zeitgeist’

and yah, I know a lot of people are going to think it’s a lot of tinfoil hat stuff, but so far all of the research I have done on them proved out to be true. but then again, don’t trust me, research it yourself and find out 🙂

It’s on the way…

It’s nearly here. It’s sitting in a warehouse within a couple of miles of my work.

Specs:

It’s nearly here. It’s sitting in a warehouse within a couple of miles of my work.

Specs:

  • T7200 Dual-core 2GHz Intel Core2Duo processor
  • Two gigabytes of 533MHz dual-channel memory
  • A magnesium/aluminum alloy top and bottom to resist damage.
  • 256 megabyte NVidia 7900 GS video card
  • Seventeen-inch, 1920×1200 WUXGA glossy widescreen
  • Integrated 2.1 sound with subwoofer (OK, OK, the “subwoofer” is a bit of a joke, but it’s much better sound than most laptops, I owned its predecessor and it was great.)
  • Extended-run 9-cell 80wh battery
  • Integrated Bluetooth, 100Mbit Ethernet, and Wi-Fi
  • 5-in-1 card reader
  • SATA 120GB 7200 RPM hard drive
  • DVI, VGA, and S-Video out
  • Firewire
  • Six USB ports

Yes, it’s almost here, my new desktop-replacement laptop to replace my safety-recalled one. Yeah, OK, it’s a one-year-old model, but it has up-to-date video cards and processors! And I get to re-use the extra 130 watt power supply and battery I bought for my old computer since they will fit.

This class of seventeen-inch laptops are really designed as desktop replacement machines with some mobility. My intention is to baby this one, use an external mouse and keyboard, and keep it on a desk most of the time rather than carting it around. They are quite portable, with decent battery life on the extended-run battery (2-3 hours), but heavy and easily scuffed. However, they are the bee’s knees for LAN parties, presentations, and hardware comparisons which are the geek equivalent to peeing contests.

This geek is excited!

The Weasel-ey answers

Apparently a response to Mitt Romney’s recent speech regarding his faith, FOX News published “21 Questions Answered About Mormon Faith“. I will cut the LDS public relations department some slack here, as perhaps there was not space enough to answer some of the questions completely. That said, there are some answers that seem downright disingenuous.

Apparently a response to Mitt Romney’s recent speech regarding his faith, FOX News published “21 Questions Answered About Mormon Faith“. I will cut the LDS public relations department some slack here, as perhaps there was not space enough to answer some of the questions completely. That said, there are some answers that seem downright disingenuous.

Most of the answers are succinct, though, and the article is worth a read. I am only going to correct a few.

Q: Why do some call the Church a cult?

A: For the most part, this seems to stem from a lack of understanding about the Church and its core doctrines and beliefs. Under those circumstances it is too easy to label a religion or other organization that is not well-known with an inflammatory term like ‘cult.’ Famed scholar of religion Martin Marty has said a cult means a church you don’t personally happen to like. We don’t believe any organization should be subjected to a label that has come to be as pejorative as that one.

Insofar as “cult” is used solely to describe religions, and to describe “a faith I don’t like”, this answer might be reasonably accurate. However, according to Steven Hassan’s BITE model, the LDS church qualifies as cult-like in a disturbing number of aspects.

A better lesson for the church to take from the use of the word describing them would be to correct those areas where they act like a cult. It won’t dissuade hard-core Christian polemicists who dislike LDS unorthodoxy, but it would persuade a lot of people that the organization is making progress toward bettering their religion. Including me.

Disclaimer: I know they’ve made some progress, but it’s slow and admits no fault for previous inaction or negative actions. This is a very corporate-style thing to do.

Q: Where is the planet Kolob? What significance does the planet have to Mormons?

A: ‘Kolob’ is a term found in ancient records translated by Joseph Smith. Joseph Smith did not provide a full description or explanation of Kolob nor did he assign the idea particular significance in relation to the Church’s core doctrines.

This is a side-step of a thorny issue for the LDS church, namely the Book of Abraham “translation”. By saying it’s not significant relative to “core doctrines”, the Church is giving a classic example of the “milk before meat” approach: don’t answer the question until the hearers are ready for further light and knowledge. Former LDS apostle Henry D. Moyle put it this way: “When they don’t ask the right questions, I just answer the ones they should have asked.”

Here’s the real answer: According to LDS scriptures, Kolob is a star or planet near the Throne of God. These whereabouts are not specified, nor is it specified whether this is a physical or spiritual location. It has no particular significance to LDS theology besides a single song in the LDS hymnal, “If You Could Hie To Kolob”.

Q: Does the Mormon Church believe its followers can become “gods and goddesses” after death?

A: We believe that the apostle Peter’s biblical reference to partaking of the divine nature and the apostle Paul’s reference to being ‘joint heirs with Christ’ reflect the intent that children of God should strive to emulate their Heavenly Father in every way. Throughout the eternities, Mormons believe, they will reverence and worship God the Father and Jesus Christ. The goal is not to equal them or to achieve parity with them but to imitate and someday acquire their perfect goodness, love and other divine attributes.

The correct answer is “yes”, perhaps followed by the explanation above. The LDS temple anoints individuals to become “Kings and Queens, Priests and Priestesses” in the next life… but what that means specifically is kind of vague. “As man is, god was; as god is, man may become” is deeply-rooted doctrine in the LDS church, though Gordon B. Hinckley dismissed it on television as “only a couplet” which we didn’t really know the meaning of. The explanation above only fits when you understand that, at the time any Man becomes as God is, God will already be far, far beyond that level.

Q: Does the Mormon Church believe that women can only gain access to heaven with a special pass or codewords?

A: No.

This answer is the reason I decided to write this entry. I dislike it when a complicated question is answered with a simple answer… because the answer is often simply wrong.

For instance, in one of the recent Republican debates, Fred Thompson and the other debaters were asked a complex question regarding Global Warming with a show of hands: “How many of you believe global climate change is a serious threat and caused by human activity?” I’m ideologically on the opposite end of this issue from Thompson’s position, yet I respect his rejection of a simple up or down vote. I personally believe it is a serious threat which we should plan on. However, it is not solely caused by human activity. I think we are substantial contributors to a portion of the recent trend.

Their simple answer to a complex question can only be justified by the LDS unique understanding of “heaven”. The LDS “heaven” has multiple levels: 1. The Telestial, or lowest heaven. 2. The Terrestrial, or middle heaven. 3. The Celestial, or highest heaven, which in turn has multiple levels. The “highest degree” of the Celestial Kingdom is reserved for those who have temple marriages and are faithful and endure to the end.

The only place for the deceased which is not a Heaven is “Outer Darkness”, reserved for those who “deny the Holy Ghost”… which at this point due to watering-down of the doctrine over time, means only those who have had a personal visitation from a supernatural entity and later deny it. The Telestial kingdom is equivalent to the non-LDS concept of “Hell”. But it’s called a degree of Heaven in LDS theology, and considered magnificent and wonderful compared to the world we live in today.

In order to ascend to the highest degree of Celestial glory, a female Latter-Day Saint provides her “new name” — a name provided her in the temple, ostensibly a secret — to her prospective husband who will be sealed to her prior to symbolically entering the Celestial Kingdom (the “Celestial Room” in an LDS temple). This is supposed to represent the order of things in the Celestial Kingdom, that her husband will lift her to glory therein.

If the question had used the right code words, they would have gotten the opposite answer. They should have asked the question like this:

“Q: Does the LDS church believe that women can only gain access to the highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom with a special pass or code word?

A: Yes. And the men, too.”

As far as the rest of it goes, meh, OK, there may be doctrinal niggles here and there I’d like to deal with, but I lack the time or interest. The questions above, however, had answers which bordered on prevarication. Several clearly play upon the difference in definitions of certain terms between LDS and mainstream Christian denominations. I hope I cleared things up.

As a side note, this appears to be the opening salvo in a new LDS campaign to get members involved in Internet discussions. It was only a few years ago when LDS leaders strongly discouraged members from the same, due to the large number of participants who later became disaffected from the church. I think that as this election year warms up, if Mitt Romney wins the Republican primary, you’ll see a whole lot more news articles about this uniquely American religion.