Grounded…

So today we went to “Warbirds over Salt Lake” (or, depending on who you believe, “Warbirds over Utah”). This is a R/C model event that’s all about flying the scale-model military aircraft.

So today we went to “Warbirds over Salt Lake” (or, depending on who you believe, “Warbirds over Utah”). This is a R/C model event that’s all about flying the scale-model military aircraft.

It was pretty good fun. During the drive in, the weather changed from calm to 15-20MPH winds. Unfortunately, for many of these people showing off $4000+ model airplanes, that’s simply too much wind to fly in where they’re concerned about crashing the model. This basically meant that only the most devil-may-care pilots flew.

So not a lot of planes in the air, but the ones that were were flown with style, panache, and reckless disregard for the safety of the aircraft 🙂 It was great fun!

Unfortunately, there was one crash: a scale model twin-engine B-25. It was pilot error, clearly: the pilot initiated a downwind turn at far too low an airspeed and altitude, tip-stalled, and turned his beautiful bird into an expensive trash bag full of firewood. Alas, you never like to see that happen. This particular pilot had taken his bomber model up four times the same day, working hard to keep the fans entertained when so few pilots were willing to brave the wind. He easily had flown more than every other pilot, save one indefatigable P-51 pilot who kept his bird in the air most of the day.

Must have been exhausting.

Me? Unfortunately, I didn’t feel like shilling out the $10 pilot fee to get into the air. I had a “warbird”, of a sort… a ParkZone F-27 Stryker. It’s a foam model, darn near indestructible, and if you do crash it, repairs are just some 3M Super 77 adhesive and strapping tape away. Trying to herd four children, though (and later in the day, 3 children) pretty much precluded my participation, too.

Next year, I’ll have to arrange a babysitter for a child or two so I can actually fly in the event!

Anyway, despite the steadily increasing winds, we had a great time. The one big plus about the high winds–up to 30MPH at times!– was that the downwind passes were extremely fast. It was amazing to see a 35% scale Corsair blow by at greater than 90MPH land-speed while doing an 8-point roll.

I decided to haul out my Stryker for some backyard-field fun afterwards, but when the plane began flying backwards at full-throttle 8 minutes into the flight, I decided it was time to haul it in. The two little boys with me get bored after about 10 minutes of flight time with my plane… it’s much quieter and smaller than the big, noisy, gas-guzzling giants flown at the field today.

Anyway, if you’re in the mood for some cheap entertainment, this is a great time of year to find a local model airfield and learn what events are happening there. They’ll generally have food, friendly people, and lots of airplanes in the air.

— Matt B.

Serenity thoughts, reviews, impact

Last night, Christy and I went to the 7 PM showing of Serenity, Joss Whedon’s movie which carries on the story of Firefly, the critically-acclaimed cult-hit television series. Spoilers, discussion, thoughts below. If you haven’t seen it, best vamoose your gorram hide till you got it taken care of.

Last night, Christy and I went to the 7 PM showing of Serenity, Joss Whedon’s movie which carries on the story of Firefly, the critically-acclaimed cult-hit television series. Spoilers, discussion, thoughts below. If you haven’t seen it, best vamoose your gorram hide till you got it taken care of.

The Audience and the Theater

The first thing that struck me as we entered the theater was the audience. It wasn’t very large, for opening day of a hoped-for blockbuster hit. The theater was about 2/3 full. This is definitely not the opening day of the next Star Wars movie, eh? However, it was really interesting to listen to the conversations around me. These people were discussing the story, the plots, wondering whether the bad guy would be one of the “two by two, hands of blue” or something completely different, and waiting with very expectant anticipation for the movie to start.

Curiously, the movie opens with little fanfare. There is no blast of trumpets, followed by a familiar soundtrack. The opening is quiet, almost reserved, with no opportunity for the applause that often accompanies the opening of a fan favorite on its first day. You are plunged into a new, unexpected story, meeting a young version of River Tam in a dream sequence, and shortly thereafter reliving her escape at the hands of her brother, Simon.

The Opening

I’ve gotta say this: Simon is a convincing character, dressed in his military outfit. I seriously did not know what was going on for the first minute of the escape sequence, until just before Simon made it clear he was rescuing River, and not just observing her. River is disturbing as always, being where she shouldn’t be, doing things she shouldn’t do.

Unfortunately, the entry for the villain was all too expected. The moment the scientist and his two guards stormed into the records chamber demanding the assassin’s authorization, I knew they were going to die. There was no way they couldn’t! I thought, however, that the line “Well, I didn’t happen to bring a sword with me today” was a very clever segue into the assassination sequence. For once, in a movie, the reaction of an onlooker (the hall of records girl who had let him in) was believable. She’s petrified, moaning and tearful at the deaths she’s just witnessed.

The Witty Repartee

One of my favorite things about Whedon writing is the plethora of memorable one or two-line interactions between characters. The only sad thing about them in this movie is that several of the best ones were in the teaser trailer! But here are the ones I got a kick out of.

Mal: “Define Interesting.” Wash: “Oh God, Oh God, we’re all gonna’ die?”

River: “I swallowed a bug.”

Mal: “Do you wanna be Captain?” Jayne: “Yeah, I do!” Mal: “Oh. Uh…. well, you can’t!”

Kaylee: “It’s been more than a year since I had anything betwixt my nethers didn’t run on batteries!”

Wash: “I am a leaf on the wind.”

River, to Simon: “You’ve always protected me. My turn.”

Simon, to River: “Am I talking to Miranda now?” River: <makes face like “I can’t believe you just said that” and “that was dumb, bro” put together> Simon: “Never Mind.”

Zoe: “I will not turn this ship into an abomination!”

The Storyline

My main complaint about the storyline is that, to my mind, it didn’t seem to go where the TV show was taking it. Of course, since it’s a stand-alone movie, that’s not entirely unexpected, and I’m sure if someone sees the movie without knowing the TV series, this makes more sense. They did a great job of providing background for those people who had never seen the movie, I thought.

For once, I was very surprised when I learned the secret of the movie. It wasn’t so much that 30 million people had been killed by the government. I kind of expected something along those lines. It was that, through this failed experiment, the Reavers had been created. That was utterly unexpected! Given that the Reavers have been the bogeymen of both the series and the movie, I’ve never been satisfied with the explanation that they were men who “ain’t men. Or they forgot how to be. Now they’re nothing. They got out to the edge of the galaxy, to that place of nothing, and that’s what they became”. They wrapped this up very nicely.

The ending

OK, the space battle scene was amazing. It was all too brief, actually: seeing Serenity dodging, weaving, with Wash at the controls hurtling the ship around–and into–obstacles was really exciting. Alas, I realized, this was not an end to the Reavers as a plot device. Given that 30 million people perished on Miranda, there is ample opportunity to keep showing more and more Reavers in future movies and series.

I’ll have to watch the movie again, but I got the sense that the bad guy had a unique sense of honor. Much like Jubal Early (one of my favorite bad guys from the series — I wonder if they based this bad guy on him?) there is a perverse logic to what he does and how he does it. In the opening scenes, he doesn’t kill the scientist right off: he allows him to choose his own fate first, then does it for him when he fails to fall on his sword. When the weird guy with all the TV screens betrays Mal, the villain offs him with no explanation or further discourse. It’s as if he has no respect for his intended victim due to the betrayal.

“Guy killed me with a sword, Mal…” That’s a haunting line, for some reason.

Best camera shot sequence, IMHO: The blast doors open. Camera rises from the floor. River is silhouetted, posed, axe in one hand, sword in the other, dead Reavers in a circle all around her. The wall behind her implodes. Soldiers enter. Close-up of axe. A drop of blood falls to the ground. A finger tightens on a trigger. River’s eyes contract.

“Stand down.”

Loved it.

So what did you think of the movie?

— Matthew P. Barnson – – – – Thought for the moment: So much food; so little time!

Factual Error Found on Internet!

Alarmingly, a Factual Error was Found on the Internet! This little news blurb is from 2002, somehow slipping under the radar for three years before the major news services picked it up.

Alarmingly, a Factual Error was Found on the Internet! This little news blurb is from 2002, somehow slipping under the radar for three years before the major news services picked it up.

OK, I’m joking, the Onion is a fake news site. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t abundant factual errors on the Internet. They abound, everywhere. Even here (though I’m hard-pressed to find a link).

But Christy and I were just talking about this yesterday. A side-effect of the Internet is that more and more people will use the Internet to express their freedom of speech. In China, they make no bones about arresting people for expressing opinions on topics the governmet disapproves of. In the US, we satisfy our need for censorship by banning books in the name of “the children” and throwing webmasters of free sites in jail for not knowing that explosives information was on their site.

But this pure, unadulterated ability to, within reasonable limits, set up a web site and say what you want is a fantastic innovation for putting power in the hands of the people, without precedent since the invention of the Gutenberg press. I work with it every day, and yet I still think it is amazing, and the impact far-reaching. I can chat on a message board with anybody, anywhere in the world, for almost free as long as we both have Internet access. And carry on conversations in almost-real-time, the back-and-forth and witty repartee an unending stream without interruption.

Compare that to just twenty years ago, where if you wanted to correspond with someone in Great Britain, your choices were either time-consuming or expensive: post, telegram, fax, or long-distance phone call.

And yet… Sturgeon’s Law applies. 90% of everything is crap.

In this day of instant access to information, how do you filter what you read so that you’re not overwhelmed? Do you rely on major news sites? Blogs? Magazines? Or do you just randomly read, relying on your intuition to guide you as to what to believe and what to write off?

Good at and didn’t know it

As a youth, I desparately wanted to be a pro basketball player. I seemed to have the height–at thirteen, I was already about 5 feet, 9 inches tall–and I practiced endlessly.

As a youth, I desparately wanted to be a pro basketball player. I seemed to have the height–at thirteen, I was already about 5 feet, 9 inches tall–and I practiced endlessly.

For a year solid, I walked down to the local blacktop, rain or shine, even with snow, snow-shovel in hand, to shoot hoops for at least an hour a day. Sometimes other kids would join me, and sometimes not. I would shoot from all over the court, aiming for that perfect “swish” through the hoop.

A year, and much hard work later, I still sucked. Winners never quit, they say. I say, if you never win, and never quit, you’re insane. So I quit. I was a terrible basketball player. Still am, I suspect, but I stopped even trying to play about a decade ago because it seemed like I twisted my ankle every single time, and spent two weeks in crutches to pay for my fun.

But you know what? Sometimes, you find out there are things that you are good at, and you just didn’t know it.

Well, I recently discovered that I’m good at flying model airplanes. I guess all that time playing video games paid off. Really, flying is just two joysticks. Rather like Robotron with wings. And a nasty, expensive crunch if the robots get you.

I suspect the skill would translate to full-scale airplanes, too, but it may take a while before I can save up the money for a pilot’s license.

What about you? What new skill have you learned in the last year or two and discovered you’re good at something you didn’t know you were good at?

I must follow…

So I went looking at my syndication list, and I happened across Jen Gagne’s “What Cute Animal Am I?” Meme post. So, being the follower that I am, I decided to try for myself. I thought the results were humorous, given that I was following Jen’s lead…

So I went looking at my syndication list, and I happened across Jen Gagne’s “What Cute Animal Am I?” Meme post. So, being the follower that I am, I decided to try for myself. I thought the results were humorous, given that I was following Jen’s lead…

You Are A: Lamb!

lambPeaceful and gentle, lambs have been used in religious imagery for millennia. Lambs are baby sheep, an animal tended by shephards since the dawn of history. As a lamb, you tend to stay together in a flock and graze on grassy land. Lambs don’t mind being led and tend not to go off on their own.

You were almost a: Duckling or a Monkey
You are least like a: Kitten or a ParakeetWhat Cute Animal Are You?

I just love these useless quizzes! I don’t know why I always find them so entertaining. Probably because they’re all about me talking about me.

The stars, fondly

Occasionally, my web site is simply a dumping grounds where I put notable stuff so that I don’t forget it. Here is one such case: The Old Astronomer to his Pupil, a poem written by Sarah Williams, written in 1868.

Occasionally, my web site is simply a dumping grounds where I put notable stuff so that I don’t forget it. Here is one such case: The Old Astronomer to his Pupil, a poem written by Sarah Williams, written in 1868.

Reach me down my Tycho Brahe, I would know him when we meet, When I share my later science, sitting humbly at his feet; He may know the law of all things, yet be ignorant of how We are working to completion, working on from then to now.

Pray remember that I leave you all my theory complete, Lacking only certain data for your adding, as is meet, And remember men will scorn it, ’tis original and true, And the obliquy of newness may fall bitterly on you.

But, my pupil, as my pupil you have learned the worth of scorn, You have laughed with me at pity, we have joyed to be forlorn, What for us are all distractions of men’s fellowship and smiles; What for us the Goddess Pleasure with her meretricious smiles.

You may tell that German College that their honor comes too late, But they must not waste repentance on the grizzly savant’s fate. Though my soul may set in darkness, it will rise in perfect light; I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night.

Ebay scammers, the revenge

I have only one thing to say:

Best revenge on eBay scammer ever (or you can try the original link here. Apparently, the main site has gone offline from time to time). As you might know, I have some small interest in exposing eBay scammers, and reading this just brought a sm

I have only one thing to say:

Best revenge on eBay scammer ever (or you can try the original link here. Apparently, the main site has gone offline from time to time). As you might know, I have some small interest in exposing eBay scammers, and reading this just brought a smile to my face, a tear of laughter to my eye, and a satisfied head-nod for the lousy scammer who got his comeuppance.

Mental innoculation

Perched on the edge of my hard, wooden kitchen chair, I didn’t know what to say.

Two of my children, my oldest, Sara, nearly 10 years old, and Zachariah, 8, were on the bench across from me, our pizza dinner nearly completed. The statement that left me speechless moments before had come from the mouth of my 8-year-old, who had recently been baptized into the LDS church.

“Dad, that’s nonsense.”

Perched on the edge of my hard, wooden kitchen chair, I didn’t know what to say.

Two of my children, my oldest, Sara, nearly 10 years old, and Zachariah, 8, were on the bench across from me, our pizza dinner nearly completed. The statement that left me speechless moments before had come from the mouth of my 8-year-old, who had recently been baptized into the LDS church.

“Dad, that’s nonsense.”

Seeing my shocked expression, and obviously misinterpreting it for a lack of understanding, he added helpfully, “What you’re saying. We believe in Jesus. You don’t. What you were telling us just now? We think it’s just nonsense.”

I was stupefied. I could not fathom what it was that would cause my otherwise bright, insightful son to reject out-of-hand scientific facts I was attempting to discuss with him. Comprehension eventually dawned upon me, but it’s not something that I could really wrap my head around until several days later.


The conversation had begun innocently enough. As is common with my kids when we’re alone, the conversation swung around to science, through mouthfuls of pizza at the kitchen table. We discussed flying remote-controlled model airplanes (my latest hobby), bugs, and eventually got around to talking about what it means to be human, what intelligence is, and that kind of thing. I decided it might be fun to re-use a line from “Contact”, one of my favorite movies of all time.

“We live in a galaxy with billions of stars, each surrounded by at least a few planets. Maybe trillions of planets. With all those stars, and all those planets, if we are the only intelligent life in the galaxy,” (here I paused for dramatic effect before uttering the fateful line), “it seems like an awful waste of space.”

“Yeah,” muttered my daughter, obviously impressed by the numbers I’d just thrown out.

“But Dad,” replied my son, “aren’t we the only ones?”

“The only ones what?” I responded, not quite catching his drift.

“The only people.”

I dug idly, with my tongue, at a chunk of pizza stuck between my teeth as I thought about his pronouncement. “Well,” I replied, “it depends on how you define ‘people’.” I continued, “There are instructions inside each of the cells in your body called ‘DNA’. Have you heard of DNA before?”

“Yes,” replied my daughter.

“No,” replied my son.

“OK,” I continued, “DNA is basically the program for your entire body. It’s what makes you a human being instead of a bird or a fish. For instance, the chimpanzee and the human share 96% of exactly the same DNA. That’s a lot! That means that there’s really very little difference between us. The biggest differences,” I tapped my head, “are up here. We have highly-developed language abilities, allowing us to communicate effectively. We have a bigger brain. At some point in the past, we stopped being as furry as many of our animal cousins. Our arms are a little shorter in comparison to our bodies. There are several hundred other differences, large and small. Out of the millions of pairs of DNA that make up our genetic code, though, those differences are very slight.

“If you shaved a chimpanzee and put clothes on him,” I said, “he’d look an awful lot like a really ugly little man!”

Both of my kids laughed hard at my obvious joke. I drove onward, though, not quite done. “But is a chimp a person?”

“No,” giggled my daughter.

“No,” chortled my son.

“Right. A chimpanzee and a human are two different species. We can’t reproduce together. Although,” I added with a smile, “that would be a very funny-looking baby!”

Again, the appreciative laugh.

“Chimps are the closest living relatives to ‘people’. Even with that, they can’t talk, and they can’t be educated much beyond the equivalent of a kindergarten education. But your little brother, Elijah,” (here I gestured toward the basement, where the aforementioned preschooler was watching a movie) “is a person, isn’t he? Even though he doesn’t talk well yet, and even a chimpanzee would have no trouble keeping up with him?

“So it’s kind of tough to define exactly what ‘people’ are. I would expect that, even though we’re the only ‘people’ we know of, that there are probably ‘people’ who live elsewhere, too. At least they may be as smart as we are. But they probably wouldn’t look much like us.”

“So if there were people on other planets,” my daughter interjected, “have they come and visited us?”

“That’s a topic for another day,” I replied. “I really don’t know. But what I do know, and what every biologist works with every single day, is that all the mammals on our planet carry a similar genetic heritage. They are more similar to us than we think! At some point in the past, it seems likely we shared a common genetic ancestor. And even today, new species come about over time, in response to changes in their environment.

“The easiest example is bacteria. The germs that make you sick. You’ve heard the commercials about taking all your medicine? That’s because, if you only take part of your medicine, you’ll allow some of the bacteria which are more resistant to the medicine to live. If they live, they’ll reproduce, and pass on their resistance to the medicine! Eventually, this will mean the medicine is no longer effective, because the bacteria will be immune to it.”

“Animals change the same way,” I concluded. “We’re the only ‘people’ we know of today, but who’s to say if some other species might be the ‘people’ on the planet a hundred-thousand years from now?”

“Dad, that’s nonsense,” came the comment from my son.


“What is it you are saying is nonsense?” I asked, somewhat lamely.

“That people are related to animals,” he said. “We’re totally different. God put us here just the way we are, and if there were people on other planets, He’d tell us.”

I think I finally understood. At some point, some trusted instructor had gotten ahold of my son’s brain, and attempted to innoculate him against reason, common sense, and imagination. I was upset by this mental vaccination of tomfoolery my son had received, but tried hard not to let it show.

“Zach, have you heard the word ‘Evolution’ before?”

“Yeah,” he replied, “you’ve talked about it before.”

“I mean, from someone other than me.”

“I think so,” he said with a quizzical frown, “but I can’t remember who.”

“OK,” I responded as I shelved the drawn-out lecture I wanted to give in favor of the short sermon he was going to receive. “I need you to listen very carefully. There are many scientists — both Mormon and non-mormon — who use the theory of evolution every day in their careers. It’s the cornerstone of modern biology and pharmacology. In other words, it’s how we understand how living things work, and how we develop new medicines which actually work to keep us living longer and healthier lives.

“There are many scientists, both Christian and Mormon,” I continued, “who are able to use the scientific facts related to evolution in their careers, and still be believers in Jesus. The two don’t necessarily preclude one another. It just means that they accept that we don’t have all the answers yet, for either religion or science.”

“Whatever, Dad,” said Zach, “but I still think what you were saying is nonsense.”

I guess my challenge over the coming weeks is to find ways to pry open my son’s brain, which some well-intentioned but ignorant instructor has attempted to nail shut. With our shared mutual interest in flying airplanes, I think we’ll start with Bernoulli’s principle (the reason airplanes fly), and find ways to tie that in to other science.

Nevertheless, the situation makes me upset. I just want to grab whoever it is that planted that idea — and that particular “nonsense” response — in my kid’s brain, shake them hard, and tell them to stay the heck out of my child’s education. Kids have a hard enough time distinguishing fact from fiction at this age. Teaching them that an entire branch of science is “nonsense” because of one’s religious beliefs is an unconscionable act of well-intentioned villainy.

— Matthew P. Barnson – – – – Thought for the moment: Famous quotations: ” ” — Charlie Chaplin

” ” — Harpo Marx

” ” — Marcel Marceau

Lightning Strikes (too weird not to post it!)

Yeah, I know I’m a day late and a dollar short, but man ignites office building due to static cling. Yeah, seriously, he built up 40,000 volts in his jacket by wearing the wrong clothing combination and set the carpet on fire by walking on it!

Yeah, I know I’m a day late and a dollar short, but man ignites office building due to static cling. Yeah, seriously, he built up 40,000 volts in his jacket by wearing the wrong clothing combination and set the carpet on fire by walking on it!

When I was a kid, it was “it’s all fun and games until somebody loses an eye”. What cheesy saying would you come up with to warn children of the dangers of static-inducing fashion? “It’s all fun and games until somebody sets the carpet on fire” just doesn’t have that ring to it.

Maybe “sure, keep scuffing your feet until you set the house on fire!” or something.

EDIT by matthew: He set the carpet on fire not on “floor”. That’s what I get for writing blogs in the middle of the night!

Five days…

Five days without a blog entry by me. By jove, I’m slipping. Too much time spent flying, working, and doing volunteer stuff for the Katrina victims, I guess.

Five days without a blog entry by me. By jove, I’m slipping. Too much time spent flying, working, and doing volunteer stuff for the Katrina victims, I guess.