The Psychology of Economics

I’ll throw one out for the MBAs in the hizzou:

On the Tuesday Morning Quarterback blog on ESPN, Gregg Easterbrook writes a column about the weekend’s NFL action as well as other random topics. This week’s blog has two points I think we all would enjoy:

1) There’s the story of former CEO of HP, who stepped down amidst allegations she hired PIs to find a leak on the HP board. Who cares? Well, the PIs called the phone company, gave personal information claiming to be members of the board to get phone records, and then used that info to determine who was the leaker. Problem is, this is against the law. So now she had to step down and may also face legal action.

I’ll throw one out for the MBAs in the hizzou:

On the Tuesday Morning Quarterback blog on ESPN, Gregg Easterbrook writes a column about the weekend’s NFL action as well as other random topics. This week’s blog has two points I think we all would enjoy:

1) There’s the story of former CEO of HP, who stepped down amidst allegations she hired PIs to find a leak on the HP board. Who cares? Well, the PIs called the phone company, gave personal information claiming to be members of the board to get phone records, and then used that info to determine who was the leaker. Problem is, this is against the law. So now she had to step down and may also face legal action.

Well, her story is she’s claiming she’s being unfairly branded as a publicity seeker. She claims this in her new book. Written about herself. With her picture all over the cover. That’s the way to prove you don’t want publicity, eh?

And she also claims she was treated unfairly at HP. Her severance package was 21 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS!!!. She made 36 million for her 5 years of work!!! Can I be treated unfairly? Please? PLEASE???!!!

2) There’s a “classical” economics experiment where two people are in a room. A third party walks in with $1000, and states the rules: Person A gets to decide how to split the money between Persons A & B. Person B gets to decide whether or not to accept it (Deal or no deal?). If B decided not to accept, no one gets anything.

Well, “classical” economics tell us the logical way for the deal to go down is for A to offer himself $999 and offer B $1. Logic tells us B should accept, because if he does, he gets $1, otherwise he gets zippy.

Well, as you can imagine, results from real people differ slightly. You have to get up to about $300 before B thinks about accepting. “Classical” economists tell us this prove humans are illogical.

Mr. Easterbrook claims a different take. It just proves money isn’t everything, and B would rather lose money than feel like a chump for getting the short end of the stick. Also, A is a fool for proposing such a lopsided split that will almost always be denied.

This can be expanded to a world view in that if both parties in a negotiating situation negotiate keeping the other’s interest in mind, the negotiations go much better. Basically, the basis of civilization is when we can start to take other’s consideration into account when we negotiate.

Just thought you’d find the article interesting, and see if anyone else had any thoughts

My $.02 Weed

A small request

Matt,

If a blog gets more than 50 replies, it creates a second page. However, if I go to recent posts and click the “x new replies” link on a blog with more than one page, it takes me to the first page. When I click to the second page, the “*new” posts aren’t new anymore and I can’t just to them.

Is there a way to prevent this. The simple solution is not to have page breaks, but that’s a server resource issue.

Matt,

If a blog gets more than 50 replies, it creates a second page. However, if I go to recent posts and click the “x new replies” link on a blog with more than one page, it takes me to the first page. When I click to the second page, the “*new” posts aren’t new anymore and I can’t just to them.

Is there a way to prevent this. The simple solution is not to have page breaks, but that’s a server resource issue.

Not that many blogs get over 50 posts, but The Needful has and so has Sam’s Gun Control post.

My $.02 Weed

Pop Drivel

So I was strangely compelled to watch Paris Hilton’s new music video. A few thoughts:

1) The song’s not bad for pop drivel. It’s catchy and listenable. I’m not putting it into the Pantheon along with U2 during the late 80s early 90s, but it’s ok.
2) The actual video is not what I’d expected at all. Paris did the “Can’t Buy Me Love/The Girl Next Door” route where the poor, picked on boy has the hot girl raise his status in school. Why can’t anyone make a good, funny movie these days without ripping off the 80s? Is it because the 80s covered all possible good teen coming of age type movies? Did John Hughes ruin it for everyone for the rest of eternity?

So I was strangely compelled to watch Paris Hilton’s new music video. A few thoughts:

1) The song’s not bad for pop drivel. It’s catchy and listenable. I’m not putting it into the Pantheon along with U2 during the late 80s early 90s, but it’s ok. 2) The actual video is not what I’d expected at all. Paris did the “Can’t Buy Me Love/The Girl Next Door” route where the poor, picked on boy has the hot girl raise his status in school. Why can’t anyone make a good, funny movie these days without ripping off the 80s? Is it because the 80s covered all possible good teen coming of age type movies? Did John Hughes ruin it for everyone for the rest of eternity? 3) I totally recommend The Superficial if you have that curiosity about celebrities but like to make fun of them because you feel ashamed for being curious about celebrities. 4) From a musical squib point of view, how much of that song is Paris’ talent and how much is being able to buy the best producers and such in the music industry?

My $.02 Weed

Freedom of the Press

Since some of you aren’t sports junkies like Mr. Graber and myself, I thought I’d enlighten you to a story involving sports, drugs, and the Constitution.

Recently, Barry Bonds, who is #2 on the all-time home run list behind Henry Aaron (not counting silly Japanse players, cause this is America, land of sports greatness). Barry Bonds was a great player but not a great home run hitter, until about age 37. Then, at the age where most athletes start a serious decline in ability, he added about 20 pounds of muscle, inches to his head circumference, and starting hitting more home runs than anyone else in the history of the game.

Since some of you aren’t sports junkies like Mr. Graber and myself, I thought I’d enlighten you to a story involving sports, drugs, and the Constitution.

Recently, Barry Bonds, who is #2 on the all-time home run list behind Henry Aaron (not counting silly Japanse players, cause this is America, land of sports greatness). Barry Bonds was a great player but not a great home run hitter, until about age 37. Then, at the age where most athletes start a serious decline in ability, he added about 20 pounds of muscle, inches to his head circumference, and starting hitting more home runs than anyone else in the history of the game.

Naturally, he attributed this un-natural power surge to lifting weights. Certainly. But then BALCO, a California-based pharmacutical company, was busted for selling designer, untraceable steriods. And lookie here, the owner fingered Mr. Bonds himself as a partaker in the medicinal magic.

Well, of course the federal government’s involved, and there’s a grand jury, and Bonds testifies, and he says he thought it was flaxseed oil and not steriods and blah blah blah. A secret grand jury, mind you, that was suspoed to be sealed.

Except two reporters for a local paper received some leaked testimony about what was said during that grand jury testimony. The used that information in a book they were writing which was an expose on Barry Bonds, which stated he used steriods and was a general a**hole. Not an article for their paper, but a book with profits and all.

Now there’s a big hubbub because these reporters have been jailed for not giving up the source of the leak of the grand jury testimony. The press is up in arms because how in the world can you make money reporting the “news” if you can’t have people breaking the law to give you the scoop. The government is prosecuting to the fullest extent of the law because how can you cover up the bad things you do if people have full rein to tell the press the bad things you do.

You can read about the story here.

Do you think the press should have the right to shield their sources?

My $.02 Weed

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Since Monsieur Schuman posted the topic about Robotron (“Weed, you prayera are answered”), I find it hilarious that the Google Ads are showing links to topics petaining to cannabis.

I AM WEED! I AM EVERYWHERE! I AM PERVASIVE!

/end ego trip
My $.02
Weed

Since Monsieur Schuman posted the topic about Robotron (“Weed, you prayera are answered”), I find it hilarious that the Google Ads are showing links to topics petaining to cannabis.

I AM WEED! I AM EVERYWHERE! I AM PERVASIVE!

/end ego trip My $.02 Weed

Advice on Linux

So I’m going to take the plunge and install Linux on my home machine. I picked Gentoo, and will go forward with it unless someone can reason me to another flavor.

My first question is this: I have 2 250 GB SATA drives on a Promise SATA controller. I can RAID them using the controller, but I’ve read that I might be better off RAIDing them using Linux RAID.

Any suggestions, hints, ideas?

So I’m going to take the plunge and install Linux on my home machine. I picked Gentoo, and will go forward with it unless someone can reason me to another flavor.

My first question is this: I have 2 250 GB SATA drives on a Promise SATA controller. I can RAID them using the controller, but I’ve read that I might be better off RAIDing them using Linux RAID.

Any suggestions, hints, ideas?

Thanks Weed

Help with Ebay Motors

Okay, so I’m selling my Pacifica. You can all look at it on eBay
here:

I get a message from an eBay member like this:

Please forward me your number. I would like to make an offer and buy your car. I AM VERY INTERESTED IN BUYING IT AND AM A SERIOUS BUYER. I live in New York. I have no problems driving up to Maryland on Saturday with Cash. Please forward a phone number so I can talk to you directly or just call my number 917 XXX-XXXX

Okay, so I’m selling my Pacifica. You can all look at it on eBay here:

I get a message from an eBay member like this:

Please forward me your number. I would like to make an offer and buy your car. I AM VERY INTERESTED IN BUYING IT AND AM A SERIOUS BUYER. I live in New York. I have no problems driving up to Maryland on Saturday with Cash. Please forward a phone number so I can talk to you directly or just call my number 917 XXX-XXXX

Thank You, Ilya

Hope to hear from you soon.

He’s only got a 3 rating from eBay, and all his purchases are over a year old. But, at least he spells okay and the grammar is good. He capitalized Cash, and that throws a red flag to me.

So……should I call him? Call him from a place that’s not my home? Tell him to go through eBay? Whaddya think?

My gut tells me it’s shady, but what can calling him hurt?

My $.02 Weed

Does Anyone Know Where I Can Get Some Ringtones?

Bandbox.com, perhaps?

I love spammers…
I love spammers chocking on their own vomit.
I love spammers being audited by the IRS.
I love spammers getting incurable STDs.
I love spammers finding the SO cheating with their best friends.

/end rant

My $.02
Weed

Bandbox.com, perhaps?

I love spammers… I love spammers chocking on their own vomit. I love spammers being audited by the IRS. I love spammers getting incurable STDs. I love spammers finding the SO cheating with their best friends.

/end rant

My $.02 Weed

Pyschology of Suicide Bombers

I received one of those emails today which looked like a propaganda piece, but I read it for some reason. It turned out to be interesting, and I thought I’d post it for comments:

The psychology behind suicide bombings. By – Pierre Rehov, documentary filmmaker
On July 15, MSNBC’s “Connected” program discussed the July 7th,2005 London attacks.

One of the guests was Pierre Rehov, a French filmmaker who has filmed six documentaries on the intifada by going undercover in the Palestinian areas.Pierre ‘s upcoming film, “Suicide Killers,” is based on interviews that he conducted with the families of suicide bombers and would-be bombers in an attempt to find out why they do it. Pierre agreed to a request for a Q&A interview here about his work on the new film.

I received one of those emails today which looked like a propaganda piece, but I read it for some reason. It turned out to be interesting, and I thought I’d post it for comments:

The psychology behind suicide bombings. By – Pierre Rehov, documentary filmmaker On July 15, MSNBC’s “Connected” program discussed the July 7th,2005 London attacks.

One of the guests was Pierre Rehov, a French filmmaker who has filmed six documentaries on the intifada by going undercover in the Palestinian areas.Pierre ‘s upcoming film, “Suicide Killers,” is based on interviews that he conducted with the families of suicide bombers and would-be bombers in an attempt to find out why they do it. Pierre agreed to a request for a Q&A interview here about his work on the new film.

Q – What inspired you to produce “Suicide Killers,” your seventh film?

A – I started working with victims of suicide attacks to make a film on PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) when I became fascinated with the personalities of those who had committed those crimes, as they were described again and again by their victims. Especially the fact that suicide bombers are all smiling one second before they blow themselves up.

Q – Why is this film especially important?

A – People don’t understand the devastating culture behind this unbelievable phenomenon. My film is not politically correct because it addresses the real problem, showing the real face of Islam. It points the finger against a culture of hatred in which the uneducated are brainwashed to a level where their only solution in life becomes to kill themselves and kill others in the name of a God whose word, as transmitted by other men, has become their only certitude.

Q – What insights did you gain from making this film? What do you know that other experts do not know?

A – I came to the conclusion that we are facing a neurosis at the level of an entire civilization. Most neuroses have in common a dramatic event, generally linked to an unacceptable sexual behavior. In this case, we are talking of kids living all their lives in pure frustration, with no opportunity to experience sex, love, tenderness or even understanding from the opposite sex. The separation between men and women in Islam is absolute.

So is contempt toward women, who are totally dominated by men. This leads to a situation of pure anxiety, in which normal behavior is not possible. It is no coincidence that suicide killers are mostly young men dominated subconsciously by an overwhelming libido that they not only cannot satisfy but are afraid of, as if it is the work of the devil. Since Islam describes heaven as a place where everything on Earth will finally be allowed, and promises 72 virgins to those frustrated kids, killing others and killing themselves to reach this redemption becomes their only solution.

Q – What was it like to interview would-be suicide bombers, their families and survivors of suicide bombings?

A – It was a fascinating and a terrifying experience. You are dealing with seemingly normal people with very nice manners who have their own logic, which to a certain extent can make sense since they are so convinced that what they say is true. It is like dealing with pure craziness, like interviewing people in an asylum, since what they say, is for them, the absolute truth. I hear a mother saying “Thank God, my son is dead.” Her son had became a shaheed, a martyr, which for her was a greater source of pride than if he had became an engineer, a doctor or a winner of the Nobel Prize.

This system of values works completely backwards since their interpretation of Islam worships death much more than life. You are facing people whose only dream, only achievement goal is to fulfill what they believe to be their destiny, namely to be a Shaheed or the family of a shaheed. They don’t see the innocent being killed, they only see the impure that they have to destroy.

Q – You say suicide bombers experience a moment of absolute power, beyond punishment. Is death the ultimate power?

A – Not death as an end, but death as a door opener to the after life. They are seeking the reward that God has promised them. They work for God, the ultimate authority, above all human laws. They therefore experience this single delusional second of absolute power, where nothing bad can ever happen to them, since they become God’s sword.

Q – Is there a suicide bomber personality profile? Describe the psychopathology.

A – Generally kids between 15 and 25 bearing a lot of complexes, generally inferiority complexes. They must have been fed with religion. They usually have a lack of developed personality. Usually they are impressionable idealists. In the western world they would easily have become drug addicts, but not criminals. Interestingly, they are not criminals since they don’t see good and evil the same way that we do. If they had been raised in an Occidental culture, they would have hated violence. But they constantly battle against their own death anxiety. The only solution to this deep-seated pathology is to be willing to die and be rewarded in the afterlife in Paradise .

Q – Are suicide bombers principally motivated by religious conviction?

A – Yes, it is their only conviction. They don’t act to gain a territory or to find freedom or even dignity. They only follow Allah, the supreme judge, and what He tells them to do.

Q – Do all Muslims interpret jihad and martyrdom in the same way?

A – All Muslim believers believe that, ultimately, Islam will prevail on earth. They believe this is the only true religion and there is no room, in their mind, for interpretation. The main difference between moderate Muslims and extremists is that moderate Muslims don’t think they will see the absolute victory of Islam during their lifetime, therefore they respect other beliefs. The extremists believe that the fulfillment of the Prophecy of Islam and ruling the entire world as described in the Koran, is for today. Each victory of Bin Laden convinces 20 million moderate Muslims to become extremists.

Q – Describe the culture that manufactures suicide bombers.

A – Oppression, lack of freedom, brain washing, organized poverty, placing God in charge of daily life, total separation between men and women, forbidding sex, giving women no power whatsoever, and placing men in charge of family honor, which is mainly connected to their women’s behavior.

Q – What socio-economic forces support the perpetuation of suicide bombings?

A – Muslim charity is usually a cover for supporting terrorist organizations. But one has also to look at countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran, which are also supporting the same organizations through different networks. The ironic thing in the case of Palestinian suicide bombers is that most of the money comes through financial support from the Occidental world, donated to a culture that utterly hates and rejects the West (mainly symbolized by Israel).

Q – Is there a financial support network for the families of the suicide bombers? If so, who is paying them and how does that affect the decision?

A – There used to be a financial incentive in the days of Saddam Hussein ($25,000 per family) and Yasser Arafat (smaller amounts), but these days are gone. It is a mistake to believe that these families would sacrifice their children for money. Although, the children themselves who are very attached to their families, might find in this financial support another reason to become suicide bombers. It is like buying a life insurance policy and then committing suicide.

Q – Why are so many suicide bombers young men?

A – As discussed above, libido is paramount. Also ego, because this is a sure way to become a hero. The shaheed are the cowboys or the firemen of Islam. Shaheed is a positively reinforced value in this culture. And what kid has never dreamed of becoming a cowboy or a fireman?

Q – What role does the U.N. play in the terrorist equation?

A – The U.N. is in the hands of Arab countries and third world or ex-communist countries. Their hands are tied. The U.N. has condemned Israel more than any other country in the world, including the regime of Castro, Idi Amin or Kaddahfi. By behaving this way, the U.N. leaves a door open by not openly condemning terrorist organizations. In addition, through UNRWA, the U.N. is directly tied to terror organizations such as Hamas, representing 65 percent of their apparatus in the so-called Palestinian refugee camps. As a support to Arab countries, the U.N. has maintained Palestinians in camps with the hope to “return” into Israel for more than 50 years, therefore making it impossible to settle those populations, which still live in deplorable conditions. Four hundred million dollars are spent every year, mainly financed by U.S. taxes, to support 23,000 employees of UNRWA, many of whom belong to terrorist organizations (see Congressman Eric Cantor on this subject, and in my film “Hostages of Hatred”).

Q – You say that a suicide bomber is a ‘stupid bomb and a smart bomb’

simultaneously. Explain what you mean.

A – Unlike an electronic device, a suicide killer has until the last second the capacity to change his mind. In reality, he is nothing but a platform representing interests which are not his, but he doesn’t know it.

Q – How can we put an end to the madness of suicide bombings and terrorism in general?

A – Stop being politically correct and stop believing that this culture is a victim of ours. Radical Islamism today is nothing but a new form of Nazism.

Nobody was trying to justify or excuse Hitler in the 1930s. We had to defeat him in order to make peace one day with the German people.

Q – Are these men traveling outside their native areas in large numbers?

Based on your research, would you predict that we are beginning to see a new wave of suicide bombings outside the Middle East ?

A – Every successful terror attack is considered a victory by the radical Islamists. Everywhere Islam expands there is regional conflict. Right now, there are thousands of candidates for martyrdom lining up in training camps in Bosnia, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Inside Europe, hundreds of illegal mosques are preparing the next step of brain washing to lost young men who cannot find a satisfying identity in the Occidental world. Israel is much more prepared for this than the rest of the world will ever be. Yes, there will be more suicide killings in Europe and the U.S.

Sadly, this is only the beginning.

My immediate thoughts: 1) How does a filmmaker get into psychological motivations like libido and repressed personalities? Does he have training? 2) I hope this is just the radical side of Islam, and there’s a more moderate sect, above what he claims is the more moderate sect. 3) Could Islam be classified as Christianity 1000 years later? Christianity doesn’t allow for other religions as well, if you want to get to heaven, but as the Western world has become more civilized, we’re not killing other people for that belief. 4) Islam = Nazism? Interesting statement… 5) The UN as a terrorist organization. I think the UN has outlived its usefulness, and I guess it’s not surprising it’s as corrupted as any other organization.

My $.02 Weed