The Lawsuit Against Health Care

Found this article in my local online rag this morning.


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Attorneys general from 13 states — including Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff — sued the federal government Tuesday, claiming the landmark health care overhaul is unconstitutional just seven minutes after President Barack Obama signed it into law.

Found this article in my local online rag this morning.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Attorneys general from 13 states — including Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff — sued the federal government Tuesday, claiming the landmark health care overhaul is unconstitutional just seven minutes after President Barack Obama signed it into law.

This is the same Attorney General who claims we don’t have the resources to enforce the Utah State Constitution, yet we somehow magically have the resources now to take up a challenge to the first bill — the first few baby steps — to reform the horribly broken, incredibly expensive bureaucracy that is the US healthcare system?

I understand that, without a public option, this amounts to an unfunded mandate like No Child Left Behind. And that execrable act at a cost of around $30Bn a year, leaving $9Bn a year to be made up by the states, still never received as much criticism as this one.

“The Constitution nowhere authorizes the United States to mandate, either directly or under threat of penalty, that all citizens and legal residents have qualifying health care coverage,” the lawsuit says.

Legal experts say it has little chance of succeeding because, under the Constitution, federal laws trump state laws.

Let me get this straight. I’m in good health. My kids are in good health. My wife is in good health. As a taxpayer, I’m already funding health care coverage and retirement for America’s over-fifty majority through FICA, and capped my Social Security benefits years and years ago… I will never see a dime of the $13,500 max (EDIT: Uhh, that’s changed. It’s over $15,000 as of 2010) the federal government is allowed to take from me every year. My employer pays $700 a month for my health insurance, and I pay $810 a month for it. So the total cost of health insurance — not including dental, vision, and life insurance — is over EIGHTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS A YEAR. Add that to FICA — which is really just a big, charitable donation at this point — and between the Feds and the insurance monopolies, I am out potentially over $30K a year.

Thirty. Thousand. Dollars. To pay for somebody else’s retirement, somebody else’s health care, and oh, by the way, a few hundred bucks of health care for me and my kids every year.

My employer refuses to give me a raise. Know why? The rising cost of health care, they tell me, IS my raise. And the amount I’m paying for health care DOUBLED over just the past nine years. We have to do SOMETHING to curb this crisis, and I’m just happy to see someone have the constituency and courage to finally get started on the process.

Then the AG for my state gets a bug in his butt to kowtow to the insurance company lobbyists, and here we are. I’m already subsidizing someone here. In my point of view, all this bloody bill does is show the average taxpayer who it is they’re paying for.

In Michigan, the Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, a Christian legal advocacy group, sued on behalf of itself and four people it says don’t have private health insurance and object to being told they have to purchase it.

You know, I get this part. The Feds mandating that every American buy private health insurance is a little bit grating. We should really have a low-cost, minimal-coverage public option that everybody could pay for if they don’t have other coverage.

Oh, wait. The right wing and insurance lobby killed the Public Option. Now they are the ones grousing about not having a public option. What the heck?

But I kind of see the point now. See, without a Public Option, this bill is an absolutely enormous win for the insurance lobby. Now everybody HAS to have insurance! What a marvelous recruiting opportunity for insurance companies!

The lawsuit claims the bill violates the 10th Amendment, which says the federal government has no authority beyond the powers granted to it under the Constitution, by forcing the states to carry out its provisions but not reimbursing them for the costs.

Right. Just like NCLB did. And all these Attorneys General lined up to block that pig-headed, anti-education mandate under George Bush, Jr.

Oh, wait. They didn’t.

Other changes would not kick in until 2014.

That’s when most Americans will for the first time be required to carry health insurance — either through an employer or government program or by buying it themselves. Those who refuse will face tax penalties.

“This is the first time in American history where American citizens will be forced to buy a particular good or service,” said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, explaining why his state joined the lawsuit.

Actually, untrue. We are required to purchase auto insurance if we drive an automobile. We are currently required to purchase health insurance if we don’t have the cash to pay for huge medical bills out-of-pocket, bills that are so huge because we’ve already been forced to fund emergency-room visits for uninsured individuals and fund huge lawsuits which are the legal community’s equivalent of winning the lottery.

Why not insurance-industry reform instead? Let’s have some oversight over the out-of-control insurance industry that charges extortionate sums and refuses to cover many of the claims. We know now that the past forty years of incredible rise in medical costs can be laid at the foot of the insurance companies, not technology or litigation.

Oh, that’s right. We can’t reform the insurance industry. They are making unheard-of profits, and own most of our politicians. That’s the only reason the current health-care bill saw the light of day: because despite the hugely-divisive nature of health care reform, this one is just enough of a sweetheart deal for the insurance industry to buy key politicians who might have considered voting against it… or voting in some other reforms.

Can you tell I’m ambivalent about this bill? I’m optimistic, but given that the public option was excised from the bill in order for it to pass, I look at it now as more charity for the bloated, unproductive insurance industry… and we need to fix that as soon as possible.

The Tea Party: Yuck!

Until today, I have largely ignored the Tea Party. Decided to read some of their own literature today. After careful study, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s a mostly-male thinly-veiled white-supremacist organization hell-bent on eliminating religious freedom from the USA. Apparently some 11% of the USA sympathizes with them.

Until today, I have largely ignored the Tea Party. Decided to read some of their own literature today. After careful study, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s a mostly-male thinly-veiled white-supremacist organization hell-bent on eliminating religious freedom from the USA. Apparently some 11% of the USA sympathizes with them. Yuck.

Here are a few specifics I’ve discovered in my half-hour of skimming their stuff. Note that I’ve had practically no exposure to their party up until now… I heard about a few poorly-attended rallies and people buying tea to throw into local harbors, but just kind of brushed it off. However, they made one of the front-page links of CNN because they are considering the creation of a third major political party in the US. Facts I learned:

  • 6 out of 10 members of the Tea Party are male.
  • After extensive Googling, I have never seen a photo of a black member of the Tea Party.
  • Around 40% of Tea Party members are retirees.

I found a few more interesting things reading their “Declaration of Redependence”, a re-write of the Declaration of Independence with modern-day Christian sensibilities rather than the Founding Father’s Enlightenment principles:

Free-market Solutions for Healthcare Reforms, Entitlement Program Reforms, Education Reforms Are Needed – Failure of our leaders to find free market and spiritual based solutions for these human needs cause citizens to flirt with compromising God’s 5th through 10th behavioral mandates. Attempts to leverage human needs and suffering and the redistribution of wealth for political power or personal enrichment has its roots in the breach of Gods first three Commandments.

Wow, do I have a number of concerns with this statement. First, they are saying that by not finding a “free market and spiritual-based solution”, political leaders are violating commandments 5 through 10. Assuming we’re talking about the Commandments in Deuteronomy 5:6-21, those commandments are:

17 You shall not murder.
18 Neither shall you commit adultery.
19 Neither shall you steal.
20 Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbor.
21 Neither shall you covet your neighbor’s wife. Neither shall you desire your neighbor’s house, or field, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

So a public option for health care, according to the Tea Party, will cause you to flirt with murder, adultery, theft, perjury, and covetousness. OK, that sounds fairly whacky to me, but now I know where they stand.

This document gets weirder.

Judicial Reforms Are Needed – The unconstitutional legislating from the judicial bench, establishing immoral precedents and ignoring the original intent of the US Constitution. Judicial arrogances prove a complete contempt for Gods first three Commandments and selective disregard for our Creators 5th, 7th, and 10th directives, while facilitating their erosion.

So, apparently, it’s time for “out with the old, in with the new”. Let’s throw out the checks and balances and go with, I don’t know, say, the Divine Right of Kings instead? Apparently, to the Tea Party, this is the new ideal: No judiciary!

What a grand idea! No check on legislative powers! Why didn’t the Founding Fathers think of this? We should ensure there are no powers to review a new law — however poorly imagined or implemented — other than how the Chief Executive chooses to implement it. Genius!

Seriously, though, I think the Tea Party folks are sore about Roe V. Wade. Apparently the Tea Party is unaware of the Constitutional Amendment process. I believe that is supposed to be the ultimate balance against judicial impropriety, and in fact we as a country have used it a number of times.

In fact, at least once in modern history we squeaked through an amendment banning alcohol from coast to coast. It took over a decade, but eventually we the people realized what a stupid idea that was, how much crime it created, what a dramatic reduction in quality of life it created, and we repealed that very bad, poorly-thought-out amendment. Since that time, we’ve been extremely cautious about passing amendments. So cautious, in fact, that despite the very loud outcry from Pro Life activists, an anti-abortion provision in the Constitution has never seen the light of day.

It’s not a conspiracy. It’s that you need overwhelming support to pass a law overturning the judgment of the Supreme Court. And apparently Americans aren’t yet willing to throw their rights under a bus driven by the whims of their state representatives. The day they are, rather than the Tea Party trying to eliminate the power of the Judicial branch of the American Government, why not have a big rally and start the kick-off party for your Constitutional Amendment banning abortions in the USA?

Heck, make it a celebration larger than any the world has ever seen. Maybe you’ll drive those leftist, commie-pinko Liberals to emigrate to Mexico or Canada where they’ll get their monthly abortions in the mail alongside their latest episode of “The Nation”.

America’s Judeo-Christian Spiritual Foundation and Responsibilities of American Citizens Recognized – Disrespect for our God and Creator, His Words in the Holy Bible and the Ten Commandments, His imprint upon our founding documents plus the assault on the traditional family and life issues moral decline in our society, contributes to the loss of our principles, values and Common Sense. Our current government leaders and judiciary revel in the violation of Gods first three Commandments and cause our citizens to be in frequent conflict with His other behavioral dictums.

Which God? Zeus? Thor? Allah? JHVH? The Great Mother?

Here’s where the Tea Party totally lost me. This nation was founded by many religions and by Enlightenment thinkers who understood that the “Divine Right of Kings” was absolutely a wrong approach to government. The power of government, to our Founding Fathers, derived not from God, not from the Bible, not from the Commandments, but from the PEOPLE. The Founders understood that to fairly govern, the government must first and foremost look after the people, not any specific religion. They wanted most of all to depart from state-sanctioned religion as experienced under the oppressive hand of England.

The Founders got their wish. Now the Tea party wants to force the US government to bow its knee to their God. We, the people, are the government; its officials are only our representatives. I would no more force my Muslim neighbor, my Hindu neighbor, or my Jewish neighbor to kneel before the Christian god than I would force a Christian to bow to an idol of Shiva.

So there you have it. Ultimately, these kinds of statements cast no doubt that the Tea Party is nothing but America’s Taliban: religious extremists hell-bent on seeing their interpretation of Christianity shoved down the throat of every American.

Whether we want it or not.

The Sh*t you don’t give

So, I rarely post anything I heard at Church, but this is worth quoting.

True story:
A pastor went to a conference in the bible belt and when it was his turn to speak, he said: “40,000 people died of starvation today and you people don’t give a shit”. The conference drew in its collective breath and sat there slackjawed. He said: “I’ll say it again, 40,000 people died of starvation today and you people don’t give a shit.”. There was rumbling in the crowd, and he looked at them, and pointed out what I think is the difference between happy, pretty, right-wing, Fox-News watching “Christianity” and the kind of Christianity I want to believe in.

He said, (and I paraphrase): “Which part of that sentence really bothered you?”

So, I rarely post anything I heard at Church, but this is worth quoting.

True story: A pastor went to a conference in the bible belt and when it was his turn to speak, he said: “40,000 people died of starvation today and you people don’t give a shit”. The conference drew in its collective breath and sat there slackjawed. He said: “I’ll say it again, 40,000 people died of starvation today and you people don’t give a shit.”. There was rumbling in the crowd, and he looked at them, and pointed out what I think is the difference between happy, pretty, right-wing, Fox-News watching “Christianity” and the kind of Christianity I want to believe in.

He said, (and I paraphrase): “Which part of that sentence really bothered you?” – because for many, it was the “curse” word, and in fact theres nothing really wrong with that word. We get so pissed off at politicians and people we work with, and that @$$hole who scratched our car. These little things that maybe, if we had a little perspective, we would brush aside, focusing our anger on real injustice or real pain, then maybe be moved to throw a couple of bucks toward folks who need it.

Whatever you believe, its a good message. Gonna go throw a couple more bucks toward Haiti, since I’m thinking about it. How bout you?

Drupal update 6.15

Updated Drupal today to version 6.15 from 5.X. No issues at all, it went perfectly. Not entirely sure I want to re-enable all the old modules. But I am sure I want to start writing in this dang thing again. It’s been months since I’ve posted due to some personal reasons. Yet the compulsion to write is hitting me again!

Updated Drupal today to version 6.15 from 5.X. No issues at all, it went perfectly. Not entirely sure I want to re-enable all the old modules. But I am sure I want to start writing in this dang thing again. It’s been months since I’ve posted due to some personal reasons. Yet the compulsion to write is hitting me again!

“Why are SSDs so much smaller than hard drives?”

Got a question from a relative the other day: “Why are SSDs so much smaller than hard drives?” Here’s my layman’s response:

Got a question from a relative the other day: “Why are SSDs so much smaller than hard drives?” Here’s my layman’s response:

A hard disk has several spinning platters. It is one of the most common failure points in a computer because it is a moving part. It’s the thing that gets replaced the most in my data center, followed closely by fans. If you eliminate those two failure points, you eliminate a lot of problems. Spinning hard disks also get quite hot due to friction and the motors involved in spinning the platters, and if you drop your laptop while the hard drive is spinning madly at 4500-10,000 RPM, it’s likely to get damaged. Hard drives are also noisy, between the noise of the spinning itself and the motors moving the heads.

Solid-State Disks, on the other hand, are perfectly quiet and have no moving parts. However, they are “memory”, and not a hard disk. The manufacturing process is completely different and much more expensive per gigabyte at the moment than hard disks, but they also have much, much faster “seek times” since a head doesn’t have to be moved by a motor to read or write to a sector. A typical USB flash drive is around $2 per gigabyte today, while a hard drive is around $0.10 (10 cents) per gigabyte (late 2009 prices).

So what are the advantages to having a SSD in your notebook instead of a hard drive? * Totally quiet * Creates less heat * Usually takes less power, resulting in longer battery life * Less likely to lose data during rough handling * Higher reliability across the board * Extremely fast “seek times” looking up data (no heads to move into position first). * Will get faster/larger in the future for the same dollar due to market demand

Disadvantages vs. a hard drive * Smaller capacity per dollar * Despite faster seek times, often no faster on sustained reads than a hard drive * Limited read/write cycles (typically a few hundred thousand before parts of the SSD are dead, though manufacturers work around this in various ways) * Cheap SSDs often have far worse performance and power requirements than comparable hard drives (varies by manufacturer)

Eventually, I see a day when virtually all portable computers will ship with SSDs instead of hard drives due to their rapid improvements and dropping prices. And, in truth, a single 20GB drive holds all the “stuff” I use day-to-day. Extra capacity beyond that is music, movies, and other storage-hogging material like my home studio recordings. Basically, at this point whether you go with SSD or a hard drive boils down to “how much storage do I need in my notebook?” which is typically dictated by whether you’re big into movies and music on your computer or not.

Good luck in your search!

Regards, Matt

LinkedIn Recommendations

What is it with LinkedIn recommendations? They seem so extreme, I have to wonder if a potential hiring manager would give them any credit at all. I’ve never given one to a colleague because I believe my ability to exaggerate is insufficient. But I’m turning over a new leaf. If any of you need a LinkedIn recommendation, I will happily provide the following (given with Matt as an example):

What is it with LinkedIn recommendations? They seem so extreme, I have to wonder if a potential hiring manager would give them any credit at all. I’ve never given one to a colleague because I believe my ability to exaggerate is insufficient. But I’m turning over a new leaf. If any of you need a LinkedIn recommendation, I will happily provide the following (given with Matt as an example):

I have known Matt for many years. Just the awareness of his existence has improved my life. I suspect he is the smartest person alive today. Certainly the best looking. I’m sorry that I ever didn’t know Matt–those early years are a painfull fog in comparison to my life after knowing Matt. If you could add John Kennedy, Winston Churchill, Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Confusius, Buddha, Jesus, Aristotle, William Shakespeare and Socrates into one person, that person would not hold a candle to Matt. If Matt asked me to slit my throat, I would do it–he is that incredible. Just saying his name, “Matt…Matt…Matt” gives me hope and joy. I pray to Matt sometimes, and he grants my desires.

The Solution to Health Care

In case anybody is interested, I have the solution to the health care problem. It’s not a new solution. I’ve touted my idea before on the site. But here it is again, in a more succinct delivery, for anyone willing to put the solution in action.

In case anybody is interested, I have the solution to the health care problem. It’s not a new solution. I’ve touted my idea before on the site. But here it is again, in a more succinct delivery, for anyone willing to put the solution in action.

The problem with the current range of health care solutions getting proposed by government is that it is based on the current system. This system is broken. If something is broken why try to refocus a cracked lens? Stop trying to build a solution out of a broken system and approach from anew.

My solution is born from the recognition that the issue isn’t about care. The issue is about health. I finally saw a stat today from the Minnesota Blue Cross CEO who wrote in an opinion piece that ‘most’ of the costs of health care come from preventable conditions. He gave a dollar amount in the billions to quantify ‘most’. This isn’t new. But it again demonstrates how health care is riddled by costs arising from personal choice – smoking and obesity.

My solution for health care is to change the nature of the proverbial carrot and stick. Right now, the stick in this country is a progressive tax system. You want to fix health care? Make health the stick.

Everybody gets public health care in this country. Unless you smoke. Then you don’t get health care. If you are obese by choice then you don’t get health care. You want to reduce the costs of health care and make it fair and accessible for everyone? Stop making tax benefits and tax breaks the stick and make health care the stick. Then institute the flat tax. With those two moves we change the entire landscape of government incentive away from ridiculous loopholes and bloated waste in a 9M word tax code and focus on a health society.

The Wooden Bowl

Ran across this parable today, thought it was cool.

A frail old man went to live with his son, daughter-in-law, and four-year old grandson.

The old man’s hands trembled, his eyesight was blurred, and his step faltered.
The family ate together at the table. But the elderly grandfather’s shaky hands and failing sight made eating difficult. Peas rolled off his spoon onto the floor. When he grasped the glass, milk spilled onto the tablecloth.

Ran across this parable today, thought it was cool.

A frail old man went to live with his son, daughter-in-law, and four-year old grandson.

The old man’s hands trembled, his eyesight was blurred, and his step faltered. The family ate together at the table. But the elderly grandfather’s shaky hands and failing sight made eating difficult. Peas rolled off his spoon onto the floor. When he grasped the glass, milk spilled onto the tablecloth. The son and daughter-in-law became irritated with the mess. ‘We must do something about father,’ said the son.

‘I’ve had enough of his spilled milk, noisy eating, and food on the floor.’

So the husband and wife set a small table in the corner. There Grandfather ate alone while the rest of the family enjoyed dinner.

Since Grandfather had broken a dish or two, his food was served in a wooden bowl.

When the family glanced in Grandfather’s direction, sometimes he had a tear in his eye as he sat alone. Still, the only words the couple had for him were sharp admonitions when he dropped a fork or spilled food.

The four-year-old watched it all in silence.

One evening before supper, the father noticed his son playing with wood scraps on the floor. He asked the child sweetly, ‘What are you making?’

Just as sweetly, the boy responded, ‘Oh, I am making a little bowl for you and Mama to eat your food in when I grow up. ‘ The four-year-old smiled and went back to work.

That evening the husband took Grandfather’s hand and gently led him back to the family table. For the remainder of his days he ate every meal with the family. And for some reason, neither husband nor wife seemed to care any longer when a fork was dropped, milk spilled, or the tablecloth soiled.

Reagan’s 1988 Address To Students

In the midst of the recent furor over President Obama’s planned address to students on September 8, 2009, I thought it would be appropriate to reprint President Reagan’s 1988 address to students. I was there. I watched in German class, and if I recall correctly we were kept an extra period to discuss his address after lunch. It was on every television set in the school, and rightly so: a President choosing to address the students of the Union is an important and rare event.

The fact of it happening is etched in my ninth-grade memory, but the details are a bit fuzzy. Here are those details, reprinted from http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1988/111488c.htm .

I plan to discuss Reagan’s address with my kids on the night of September 8. I will talk with them about how they felt, what they thought, how this affects them, and what their plans are as a result. I will try to inspire in them the desire to be the agents of positive change and leadership in society. I will share this President’s humble beginnings — like the early life of Reagan — to show them how any American can rise to the highest ranks of leadership in the nation and make it a better place for all of us.

If you are one of those who plan to keep your children home from school on September 8, I submit you are allowing fear to motivate your actions. Your children are smarter than you think; they are probably smarter than you. Teach them to make decisions in light and truth, with full knowledge of the facts in every walk of life. Do not coerce them through ignorance.

In the midst of the recent furor over President Obama’s planned address to students on September 8, 2009, I thought it would be appropriate to reprint President Reagan’s 1988 address to students. I was there. I watched in German class, and if I recall correctly we were kept an extra period to discuss his address after lunch. It was on every television set in the school, and rightly so: a President choosing to address the students of the Union is an important and rare event.

The fact of it happening is etched in my ninth-grade memory, but the details are a bit fuzzy. Here are those details, reprinted from http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1988/111488c.htm .

I plan to discuss Reagan’s address with my kids on the night of September 8. I will talk with them about how they felt, what they thought, how this affects them, and what their plans are as a result. I will try to inspire in them the desire to be the agents of positive change and leadership in society. I will share this President’s humble beginnings — like the early life of Reagan — to show them how any American can rise to the highest ranks of leadership in the nation and make it a better place for all of us.

If you are one of those who plan to keep your children home from school on September 8, I submit you are allowing fear to motivate your actions. Your children are smarter than you think; they are probably smarter than you. Teach them to make decisions in light and truth, with full knowledge of the facts in every walk of life. Do not coerce them through ignorance.

Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session With Area Junior High School Students

November 14, 1988

The President. You know, this is a real treat for me — having you here and to have, in a little while, the chance to answer some of your questions. Let me also offer a special hello to those of you who are watching on C-SPAN and — or the Instructional Television Network. Thank you for inviting us into your home or your school today.

This marks the beginning of American Education Week, and I’m particularly pleased to be talking to American students in this, the first in a series of speeches that I’ll be giving before I leave office. But before we begin here, I have a special message from my roommate. She says to please — for your families, for your friends, for your country, and most of all for yourselves — just say no to drugs.

Now, last week the United States did something so exceptional that people around the world marveled at it. Last week the American people freely elected our government. Some ballots were cast by people who were rich and famous, and others were cast by most ordinary people, but each person had the same, one vote. These ballots were cast in secret, and they were counted in the open, not the other way around. And when the votes were totaled, those holding or seeking the highest positions in the land all surrendered to the will of the people. Soon, power will be peacefully transferred from those leaving office to those taking office. And, yes, we do this every election year, and that’s what so much of the world marvels at. What we in America take for granted is something that’s rare in history and all too remarkable on this globe, the Earth.

The United States is the world’s oldest democratic government. And at my age, when I tell you something is the oldest in the world, you can take my word for it; I’m probably talking from personal experience. And it’s not just that our government is the oldest of its kind, but that it’s based on the world’s most revolutionary political idea. You can see that concept in the very first line of our Constitution, and it begins with three simple words: “We the People.” In other countries, in their constitutions — they all have constitutions, and I’ve read a great many of them, those other ones — and the difference is so small, but it’s found in those three words. Because their constitutions are documents by the Governments telling the people what they can do. And in our country, our Constitution is by the people, and it tells the Government what it can do. And only those things listed in the Constitution, and nothing else, can Government do. So, in America, it is the people who are in charge. And one day you’ll be those people out there voting and creating the Government.

That vision of self-government was the basis for the American Revolution, the first revolution of its kind and one of the most important historic events not just for our own nation but for all humanity. Because most revolutions have always just been a case of replacing one set of rulers for another set of rulers. Ours was that kind of a constitution where, for the first time, it was announced — what I’ve told you before already — that the people were in charge of the Government, not the other way around.

Now, the Revolution may seem like something they say happened a long time ago — to me 200 years seems just like yesterday — but I think it’ll prove to be America’s most important guidepost for the future. I believe that the chief moral task for America in your generation — a period destined for great change — will be not so much to chart a new course or launch a new revolution, but to keep faith with the original American Revolution and that remarkable vision of freedom that has brought us two centuries of liberty and is still today transforming the world.

Over these 200 years, country after country has followed our path, and I believe that ultimately all nations will do so. It’s no exaggeration to say that the political vision of our Founding Fathers has become the model for the world. This is true not just in the many countries that have turned from despotism to democracy these last years, it’s also true even where it’s least apparent. It’s remarkable to realize that in this century even brutal totalitarian dictatorships kneel at the feet of our Founding Fathers when they try to counterfeit the practices and institutions of democracy in order to claim legitimacy for their ruling their people. Dictators today from Afghanistan to Nicaragua do not want to be called Czar or Commissar; they want to be called Mr. President and to pretend that they rule in the people’s name, even if they don’t. Yes, even Communist dictators holding power through force, against the will of the people, acknowledge the triumph of the American idea when they go through the motions of holding phony elections, forming rubberstamp legislatures to ratify constitutions that will not be honored, and then using our words to call their regimes democracies or republics.

As a wise Frenchman one wrote: “Hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue.” But when dictators, even in this fraudulent way, acknowledge the basic truth that the right to rule comes from the consent of the governed, the door to freedom begins to crack open, and it can’t very easily be closed again. John Adams said that long before the opening shots of America’s war for independence — he was one of our Founding Fathers, as you know — our revolution had already occurred “in the hearts and minds of the people.” And today from Asia to Africa to Latin America and behind the Iron Curtain, the world is in the midst of a democratic revolution that was foretold by the creation of the United States.

From the beginning, the American vision was that our country would be the cradle of freedom for all mankind. Two hundred and thirteen years ago, in Philadelphia, James Allen wrote in this diary that: “If we fail, liberty no longer continues an inhabitant of this globe.” But our Founding Fathers didn’t fail. And now it’s our duty to bring the values of the American Revolution to all the peoples of the world, and this is happening. Today, to a degree never before seen in human history, one nation, the United States, has become the model to be followed and imitated by the rest of the world.

But America’s world leadership goes well beyond the tide toward democracy. We also find that more countries than ever before are following America’s revolutionary economic message of free enterprise, low taxes, and open world trade. These days, whenever I see foreign leaders, they tell me about their plans for reducing taxes and other economic reforms that they’re using, copying what we have done here in our country. I wonder if they realize that this vision of economic freedom — the freedom to work, to create and produce, to own and use property without the interference of the state — was central to the American Revolution when the American colonists rebelled against a whole web of economic restrictions, taxes, and barriers to free trade. The message at the Boston Tea Party — have you studied yet in history about the Boston Tea Party, where, because of a tax, they went down and dumped the tea in the harbor? Well, that was America’s original tax revolt. And it was the fruits of our labor — belonged to us, and not to the state. And that truth is fundamental to both liberty and prosperity.

But beyond politics and economics, we find that American culture has also spread around the world. Whether it’s young people in Europe or Africa going to an Eddie Murphy movie or Japanese children visiting Mickey Mouse at the new Disneyland in Tokyo or the international jazz festivals or the American soft drinks and rock music and blue jeans that are the choice of young people from Berlin to Beijing, from Managua to Moscow, the fact is that an entire planet is watching and following us.

The same thing is true with science and technology. We lead the world in Nobel Prizes for science, and virtually all of the most important developments in computers, communications, and biotechnology have been made in the United States. And I can’t be the only one who’s noticed that the Soviet space shuttle that’s supposed to go up at 10 p.m. tonight now — if they can get it off — it looks very familiar, an awful lot like ours. Other countries may try to copy what we do, but as the rate of progress accelerates, our leadership will become even greater. And these are the technologies that in your lifetime will change the way people all over the world live and change things for the better.

You know, I’ve seen remarkable technological change in my lifetime. Maybe I’m just going to date myself as belonging back with the dinosaurs or something when I tell you this, but just think, I can still remember my first ride in an automobile. Before cars, we went by horse and buggy. The horse was very fuel-efficient but kind of slow. And if you wanted to supercharge one, you fed him an extra bag of oats. But in pursuing your education, there is one thing I would like to pass along to you. We should always remember that there are the things that change and the things that don’t change. The machines will change — the horse and buggy to the automobile and so forth — but the people don’t. The permanent truths which give meaning to our lives don’t change; they are, as I say, permanent. The basic values of faith and family will be just as true when people are living on distant planets as they are today. So, for America to gain greatest benefit from all the exciting new technologies that lie ahead, we will also need to reaffirm our traditional moral values, because these values are the foundation on which everything we do is built. So, yes, I would encourage you to study the math and science that are at the basis of the new technologies. But in a world of change you also need to pay attention to the moral and spiritual values that will stay with you, unchanged, throughout a long lifetime.

And, again, I would say that the most important thing you can do is to ground yourself in the ideas and values of the American Revolution. And that is a vision that goes beyond economics and politics. It’s also a moral vision, grounded in the reverence and faith of those who believed that with God’s help they could create a free and democratic nation. They designed a system of limited government that, in John Adams’ words, was suited only to a religious people such as ours. Our Founding Fathers were the descendents of the Pilgrims — men and women who came to America seeking freedom of worship — who prospered here and offered a prayer of thanksgiving, something we’ve continued to do each year, and so that we’ll do it again on Thursday of next week.

By renewing our commitment to the original values of the American Revolution and to the principles of “We the People,” we can best preserve our liberty and expand the progress of freedom in the world, which is the purpose for which America was founded. Here, on a continent nestled between two oceans, our country is unique in the world. We have drawn our people from virtually every other nation on Earth, and what we’ve created here as Americans has touched every corner of the globe.

Here in the White House there’s a famous painting of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And it shows many of the great men of that time assembled in Independence Hall in Philadelphia. But when you look closely at the painting, you see that some of the figures in the hall are just outlines, waiting to be filled in, the faces have not yet been drawn. You see, this great painting isn’t finished. But what the people who gathered in Philadelphia two centuries ago set out to do is not yet finished, either. And that, I suppose, is why the painting is the way it is. America is not yet complete, and it’s up to each one of us to help complete it. And each one of you can place yourself in that painting. You can become one of the those immortal figures by helping to build and renew America.

And we’re entering one of the most exciting times in history, a time of unlimited possibilities, bounded only by the size of your imagination, the depth of your heart, and the character of your courage. More than two centuries of American history — the contributions of the millions of people who have come before us have been given to us as our birthright. All we can do to earn what we’ve received is to dream large dreams, to live lives of kindness, and to keep faith with the unfinished vision of the greatness and wonder of America.

Now it’s time for me to ask you for your questions, but first I’d like to ask you one: What are some of the things that you’re proudest of and some of the things that are best about America? And maybe I can just take a couple of comments if someone has a comment to make.

Yes?

Q. Okay. My name is Yolanda Coleman. And I’m from Jefferson Junior High School, and I’m a seventh grade student. For one thing, I’m so happy that America is a free country and that we have Presidents such as yourself to help us in any kind of way, such as drug-related events and a whole lot of other things that I’m grateful for to be in America.

The President. Young man, you had your hand up. Didn’t you have your hand up?

Q. My name is Jason Mills. I’m from Poolesville Junior-Senior High School. And one thing that I’m glad about in America — —

The President. Can you speak a little louder? I — —

Q. Okay. One thing that I’m glad about in America is that you can choose what school you can go to, like if it was private or if it was public.

The President. Yes. Anyone else with another comment? Well then, we’ll get down to the questions. And what you were talking about in your freedom is something that, for example, in one country, as I have been told, the Soviet Union — when it comes time to graduate, government representatives come in and point out to the individuals where they will report to work after they have graduated. The Government tells you what you’re going to do, not like ours, where we decide, each one of us, what we want to do and then set out to do it.

Well, tell me now, let’s have some of your questions. Yes, again?

War on Drugs

Q. Again, my name is Yolanda. Mr. President, do you plan to work with your wife, Nancy Reagan, in the say no to drug program?

The President. Well, yes, I am already. And we have appropriated quite a sum of money for the drug battle. And we have actually gotten more convictions of drug peddlers and longer sentences for them than any other administration. And we have intercepted more drugs and planes and boats and trucks and cars that carry them than has ever been done before. But that isn’t the answer to the drugs. They’ll still — with the borders we have and the coastlines — they can still get drugs into our country. It has to begin with you, the young people. You have to decide no to drugs. In other words, if we can’t keep all the drugs from reaching the customers, let’s have the customers turn against the drugs. And that is really the answer. And there is some success in that. A few years ago, 1 out of 9 high school seniors had tried drugs. Today it’s less than 1 out of 30. So, we’re gaining on it.

Administration Accomplishments

Q. My name is Yvette Ross, Jefferson Junior High School. I’m an eighth grade student. Mr. President, do you feel that in your two terms as President your administration has carried out the ideas of the Founding Fathers?

The President. No — I’m having a little trouble — —

Q. Do you feel that in your two terms as President that you and your administration have carried out the ideas of the Founding Fathers?

The President. Have we carried out the plan set by the Founding Fathers? I think we have subscribed to that. When we came into office, there were some things that we thought were very wrong, including the fact that there were more people unemployed, inflation was robbing the people of their earnings and their money, interest rates were high and all. And in these last several years, we have not only restored prosperity, but we have created almost 18\1/2\ million new jobs, added to those jobs that were already there so that unemployment is so far down that today of all the Americans, 16 years of age and up, to whatever age, that pool of people — 62.7 percent of those people have jobs, are employed today. But also, more important than that, I think we have restored the belief in America’s freedom and the obligation that we have to our country. I think there’s more patriotism today. We’ve been in a time when people have gotten rather cynical about those things.

I have to move to this side pretty quick.

Federal Deficit and Line-Item Veto

Q. My name is Casey Lee, and I’m from St. Stephen’s School. And I was wondering what was the most important thing that you wanted to accomplish, but that you weren’t able to accomplish as President?

The President. I could sum that up very briefly: the Federal deficit — the fact that for over a half a century our government has been spending more money than it takes in. And we have a plan working now that is aimed at 1993, of bringing us down each year. Last year we reduced the deficit by around $70 billion, and this year we’re aiming at about another 30 so forth. But that is the thing.

And I think that what we’re going to have to have — and what I want to strive for — is an amendment to our Constitution that requires the Government every year to balance the budget. And in doing that — also a tool for the President, and it’s called line-item veto.

Now, you probably don’t know what that means, but I’ll explain very quickly if I can. The line-item veto — the Congress when they have ways of putting in bills a number of things instead of just a bill to get one thing accomplished. And then with all these hidden things — and some of them are appropriations, spending bills and so forth — the President either has to veto the whole bill or let it become law. And sometimes they attach them to a bill that you just can’t veto. Line-item veto is what I had as a Governor. Forty-three Governors in the States have line-item veto. It means that you can go into that bill and pick out that single item that has nothing to do with the whole bill and veto that. And I think the President should have it, like the Governors do.

Federal Budget Deficit

Q. Hi. My name is Ben Allnutt. I go to Poolesville Junior-Senior High School. I was wondering if the younger generation today is going to have to pay for the world debt in years to come?

The President. No, I don’t believe that it is that big a problem. You mean our Federal deficit? No, I think that with this thing we have going along — yes, there will be a time when in the future, when government bonds come due and so forth — whether it be the taxpayers at that time that are paying them off. But if we can get this plan we’re working on into effect, that will come along gradually as those bonds come due. And that, I don’t think, will be a great threat to our economy. Truth of the matter is, bad as our Federal debt is, it is much milder than many other countries as a percentage of our gross national product.

Q. My name is Cameron Fitzhugh, and I’m from St. Agnes School in Alexandria, Virginia. I was wondering if you think that it’s possible to decrease the national debt without raising the taxes of the public?

The President. I do. That’s a big argument that’s going on in government. And I definitely believe it is because one of the principal reasons that we were able to get the economy back on track and create those new jobs and all was we cut the taxes. We reduced them because, you see, the taxes can be such a penalty on people that there’s no incentive for them to prosper and earn more and so forth because they have to give so much to the Government. And what we have found is that at the lower rates the Government gets more revenue. There are more people paying taxes because there are more people with jobs. And there are more people willing to earn more money because they get to keep a bigger share of it.

So, today, we’re getting more revenue at the lower rates than we were at the higher. And you know something, I studied economics in college when I was young, and I learned there about a man named ibn-Khaldun, who lived 1,200 years ago in Egypt. And 1,200 years ago, he said, “In the beginning of the empire, the rates were low. The tax rates were low, but the revenue was great.” He said, “In the end of the empire, when the empire was collapsing, the rates were great, and the revenue was low.” So — all right.

Minority Educational Opportunities

Q. My name is Crystal Adair, and I’m an eighth grader attending Jefferson Junior High School. And my question is: Mr. President, for past years, the educational opportunities for blacks and other minorities has not been — there hasn’t been a great deal of them. And I want to know, during your term in office, what have you done to increase those educational opportunities for us?

The President. Well, we have vastly increased the amount of Federal money that is going into education, although remember that education has always been in the province of the State and the local communities. So, the share of cost of education is not as great for the Federal Government, but we have increased it. We’ve increased the money that is available for scholarships and for workfare programs for students that have to work their way through, as I did, and also for loan funds for students.

I can assure you that, with regard to any hint of discrimination, we have done more than any other generation — or administration, I should say, to punish those who attempt to discriminate and to make sure that the opportunities are equal for all. And one of the great things that our administration did when we came in here was immediately turn on to helping something that I think is historically wonderful in our country, and that is the Negro private colleges and universities. And in fact, we helped one of them out that was facing bankruptcy, and bailed it out so that now they are proceeding in a better situation than they’ve had in the past. But those opportunities are there.

Back there, the young man in the back row, and then I’ll take you in the sweater.

U.S. Space Program

Q. Stuart Washington from Jefferson Junior High School. Mr. President, do you wish to accelerate the rebirth of our National Aeronautical and Space Administration, also known as NASA?

The President. Yes, I think the new frontier in the whole world is out there in space. And we’ve made such progress in it, and it has proved so rewarding. This isn’t talked about much, and many of you probably don’t realize that experiments conducted on the shuttle when they’re up there in space — on all kinds of things that had nothing to do with space — have brought benefits to us back here. Firemen, for example — a fireproof fabric has changed and made their fireproof garments that they have to wear in battling a fire much lighter — and that they can do that. Medicines — certain medicines in which only up in the gravity-free space can they achieve certain mixtures. And they’ve come up with things that have been beneficial in that way. So, this is very important that we continue to do this. We were set back by the Challenger tragedy, but we must continue.

Gun Control

Q. My name is Chris Allen. I’m from Poolesville Junior-Senior High School. I was just wondering what you and Mrs. Reagan feel about the new gun ban law.

The President. What we feel about the new — —

Q. Gun ban law.

The President. The gun — —

Q. Ban.

The President. Gun ban? Well, I think there has to be some control. But I thought that in California we had a system that probably was the best. I have never felt that we should, for the law-abiding citizens, take the gun away from them and make it impossible to have one. I think the wrong people will always find a way to get one. But what we had was — even if today when I go back to California, if I want a gun and go in a store to buy a gun, I have to give them the money, but I have to wait a week, no matter who I am. I have to wait a week and come back then to get the gun, because in that week, my name is presented to investigative element there in the State that checks to make sure that I have no criminal record, that I have no record of mental problems or anything of the kind. Then, and only then, can you pick up the gun and take it with you.

But if I could, I know we’re running out of time, but let me just tell you something that — I got the strangest letter when I was Governor. There was talk about having a gun ban in California. It didn’t go through. But I got a letter from a man in San Quentin prison, and from the prison he wrote me the letter to tell me he was in there for burglary. He was a burglar. And he said, “I just want you to know that if that law goes through, here in San Quentin there will be celebrating throughout the day and night by all the burglars who are in prison because” he said, “we can watch a house we plan to rob for days. We can learn the habits of the people living in that house, to know when is the best time to go in and be a burglar — rob it.” He said, “The only question we can never answer is: Does the man in that house have a gun in the drawer by his bed?” He said, “That’s a risk we have to run.” He said, “If you tell us in advance they won’t have a gun in that drawer by their bed,” he said, “the burglars in here will be celebrating forevermore.”

I thought he made kind of some common sense. And I don’t know why to this day he ever chose to send the letter to me.

All right, this gentleman.

Q. Anil Artis from Jefferson Junior High School. Do you think the “Saturday night special” should be banned?

The President. The what?

Q. Do you think the “Saturday night special” should be banned?

The President. Well, I don’t have very much of a quarrel with the very cheap weapon and so forth that makes it so easy for the wrong people to have a gun. I would like to see us concentrate on what I described in California: of making sure that anyone who buys a gun is a responsible citizen and not bent on crime.

Ms. White. Mr. President, thank you very much on behalf of the students. Students, we now have time for one more question.

Women Political Leaders

Q. Mr. President, my name is Nora Taylor, from St. Agnes School. I was wondering when do you think the first woman President will be in office?

The President. I don’t know, but believe me, I’m certainly not against it. I have a feeling, though, that probably the first thing that’ll happen is there will be a woman Vice President; and then that will kind of open a door to that. But I have no quarrel with women being President at all.

As a matter of fact, the statesman in the world that I have met that I respect the most is the Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher; and she’s done a remarkable job for England. But I guess it takes a little getting used to on the part of some people. But I think it’s inevitable that in this country there will be a woman President because they’ve come up in so many different fields. But it’s just my feeling that probably, rather than one of them just entering the fray to run for President to begin with, that maybe it probably would start with one of them — as we did in the election in 1984, have one running for Vice President. She didn’t make it, but that might be the start of it, and I’d welcome it.

I have to quit. I’m sorry about so many hands that didn’t reach me. Maybe you’d have to write and leave them with me — your questions.

I just want to tell you one little added thing about our country, and then I leave. This, again, is a letter I received not too long ago from a man, who wrote and told me this: He said, “You can go to France to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Japan; you cannot become a German or a Japanese, or a Turk, or Greece a Greek. But the one place in the world,” he said, “where anyone from any corner of the world can come: America — come to live and become an American.” And no other country has that but ours. This continent, I’ve always believed, must have been put here for a purpose, between the two great oceans, because it had to be found by people who were dissatisfied with the lack of freedom or religious persecution or whatever in their own countries and came and melded together in this great melting pot and created the United States of America.

Thank you all. It’s been a treat.

Note: The President spoke at 1:32 p.m. in the State Dining Room at the White House. Vera M. White was the principal of Jefferson Junior High School.

More Nukes! More Nukes!

Yeah. I want one of these for my back yard:

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/23247/

Imagine, a maintenance-free nuclear reactor? Sure, it’s for manned space exploration, but dayum it’s nice to see a feasible solution.

Yeah. I want one of these for my back yard:

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/23247/

Imagine, a maintenance-free nuclear reactor? Sure, it’s for manned space exploration, but dayum it’s nice to see a feasible solution.

Disclaimer: I’m 100% in favor of nuclear power on earth, too. Although it’s not a renewable resource, it’s a darn sight cleaner than all of our other non-renewable resources.