The One-Two Punch Against Ephedrine

You know, over the past few years I’ve very peripherally heard about some drug/supplement called “ephedrine”. I heard that it was banned from sale in the USA, and didn’t give it much thought. After all, I could still run down to the local pharmacy and pick up Sudafed, which was my one-stop-drug whenever I had a runny nose, and had been for years. It contained pseudophedrine — thus the name — and worked fine. If I were having trouble sleeping due to breathing congestion, I’d pick up NyQuil, which IMHO is the best night-time cold remedy on the planet and has been for decades. No biggie, right?

You know, over the past few years I’ve very peripherally heard about some drug/supplement called “ephedrine”. I heard that it was banned from sale in the USA, and didn’t give it much thought. After all, I could still run down to the local pharmacy and pick up Sudafed, which was my one-stop-drug whenever I had a runny nose, and had been for years. It contained pseudophedrine — thus the name — and worked fine. If I were having trouble sleeping due to breathing congestion, I’d pick up NyQuil, which IMHO is the best night-time cold remedy on the planet and has been for decades. No biggie, right?

Then one day a few months ago, I tried to buy my tried-and-true remedy for nasty colds, and found that I couldn’t find one that worked. The old Sudafed formulation had been replaced with a new one that, well, was about as effective as not taking anything at all. Also, the same NyQuil I’d always taken had been removed from the shelf, renamed NyQuil-D if I wanted the same ingredients, and hidden behind the pharmacy counter.

There was a little card instead of a product, telling me to go to the pharmacy counter if I wanted to buy the product.

WTF?

I didn’t buy anything that day because the pharmacy was closed, and suffered through using some of the remedies in our cabinet, including the crippled Sudafed. Unfortunately, most of the medications in our cabinet stink at actually alleviating cold symptoms for me.

On the plus side, I cleared out several dozen expired medications from the cabinet in the search for something that would work well for my runny nose that day.

Ephedrine and pseudophedrine-based medications are where it’s at for alleviating cold symptoms. They simply do a better job quicker than anything else for me. The “secret sauce” has been removed — or renamed to indicate the old formulation is now a behind-the-counter-only remedy — and I wanted to get to the bottom of the mystery.

So, of course, I turned to the Internet for research (note I don’t use the phrase “the facts”). Let me tell you, if you google “ephedrine ban”, you’re going to come up with several thousand pages with various explanations of what happened. From ephedrine loyalists to Chinese Herb practitioners to the FDA defending its ruling to the court cases that eventually upheld the ban, there are a thousand stories.

Here are the basic facts, as far as I can glean them. Note that this story has two parts to explain why ephedrine is harder to come by today than it used to be. I’m not going to delve into the pharmaceutical-company conspiracy theories; you can read plenty of those yourself in the front-page links on a Google search for the topic.

Ephedra is an herb that contains very small amounts of ephedrine, a highly potent bronchial dilator with powerful metabolism-boosting side effects. Ephedrine can be refined from naturally-occurring sources or synthesized in the lab. It gained popularity in the nineties as a weight-loss supplement because, combined with caffeine and a calorie-restricted diet, it both boosted the basal metabolic rate of study subjects as well as dramatically diminished appetite. At one point, it was estimated that approximately 10% of the American adult population — some 20+ million people — were taking ephedra or ephedrine-based supplements, mostly to aid in weight loss.

The FDA began investigating ephedra (the un-refined version of ephedrine) almost immediately after the passage of the dietary supplement act in 1992. Ephedra’s effects were quite drug-like, and in fact refined and synthetic ephedrine had been an ingredient in cold remedies and asthma medications for decades. However, as a dietary supplement under the Act, the burden of proof was on the FDA to prove an ingredient was not safe.

Eventually, the FDA’s research concluded that ephedra is deadly in sufficient quantities, implicated in a higher incidence of brain hemorrhage (at 32 mg/day or more) in otherwise healthy people, and that no dose is safe for people on antideppresants, MAOI (antidepressant) drugs, or with a heart condition or diabetes.

Type 2 diabetics represented a large proportion of the people taking ephedra because type 2 diabetes is associated with obesity, and the obese have the greatest interest in weight-loss. Unfortunately, Type 2 diabetics and the obese also are the most likely to have heart disease, high blood pressure, thyroid disease, and be on antidepressants.

The FDA passed a rule intending to ban the substance in 1998, and in 2002 the rule took effect. By 2004, they issued a final ruling and were prosecuting companies that did not comply with the rule against putting ephedra/ephedrine in herbal supplements that did not require labeling like over-the-counter drugs did. The ruling was challenged and in 2006, and eventually the FDA’s decision was upheld. Ephedra is now regarded as a drug, and now the burden-of-proof is on manufacturers to demonstrate the safeness of their product before putting it on the shelf with the “drug facts” labels, active ingredients, and all the usual disclaimers.

There were some exceptions to the ruling: traditional Chinese herbal remedies and herbal teas which were both regulated as “foods” rather than “supplements”. So the Chinese herbalists can be assuaged — though I expect this loophole to be abused — and those who like teas with ephedrine in them are unaffected.

Now here comes punch #2 in the one-two punch: the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005. Really, the FDA ban on ephedrine in herbal supplements never affected me in the least. However, Congress’ act to try to reduce meth production really did. Basically, this act enforces the following provisions related to ephedrine:

  1. Minors may not purchase.
  2. You may purchase no more than 7.5g every 30 days via mail-order. Note that this is a bigger issue for pseudophedrine than ephedrine, because the dosage is typically 3-4 times higher for the same effect.
  3. You may not purchase more than 9g per month total.
  4. All purchases must be logged, and all products containing ephedrine or pseudophedrine must be kept in a locked or secure location to enforce logging of purchases.
  5. All purchases must be logged, and you must provide a valid ID to purchase.
  6. Products must be sold in individual-dose blister packs. I guess this makes it less convenient than just dumping a whole bottle in for the meth manufacturers.

So basically, it turns out ephedrine and pseudophedrine are both still perfectly legal for personal use, if a bit irritating, time-consuming, and risky to purchase if buying for an entire family. However, if you buy over-the-counter allergy, sinus, or asthma medications for your children, you might be charged with a misdemeanor for going over the magical 7.5/9g limits.

For perspective, 9g/month is around two to three times the dose any adult should be expected to reasonably take, even if that adult is taking the usual 60mg/day dosage that people recommend in the ECA (ephedrine/caffeine/aspirin) stack for weight loss. The only downside for those using ephedrine for weight-loss is that now you have to buy your ephedrine in the form of asthma, allergy, or cold medication. And I think it’s important to keep in mind that most of the clinical trials of ephedrine for weight loss used 25mg/day or less in the subjects, and that anything over 32mg/day has been implicated in strokes in otherwise healthy subjects.

I’m going to give a home-made ECA stack a try, since I’ve really nailed the diet and exercise program and am losing a reliable 1-2 pounds per week. I’ll provide a report as to the effectiveness at some point in the future.

But hey, at least I know how to get my “real” Sudafed and NyQuil now. And I’m no longer scared of taking that little placard up to the pharmacy counter. I’m not making methamphetamines, I’m not buying an herbal supplement, and I’m not buying enough to cover multiple children with asthma or colds. One signature and a very scary-sounding stern warning about not falsifying my identity later, and I walk out with an actual effective cold & allergy remedy instead of the ineffective almost-a-placebo crap that is now sitting on the store’s public shelves.

Ten Little Things

I listened to a podcast today from Skip La Cour talking about managing one’s minimum standards. The things he mentioned were, for instance, setting a certain time to be up every day, planning one’s meals the night before and following through at the times you planned rather than winging it, and other things that you must do every single day — or at least five days a week — to be successful at whatever it is you want to do.

I listened to a podcast today from Skip La Cour talking about managing one’s minimum standards. The things he mentioned were, for instance, setting a certain time to be up every day, planning one’s meals the night before and following through at the times you planned rather than winging it, and other things that you must do every single day — or at least five days a week — to be successful at whatever it is you want to do.

I thought to myself: “What are my ten minimum standards?” I realized I currently don’t really have any. So I probably ought to set them. But unlike a traditional New Year’s resolution, these won’t be goals… these will just be things I expect myself to do every day. Or every day but the weekend, perhaps.

  1. Wake up between 5:30 and 6:00 AM.
  2. Eat breakfast at 6:00 AM
  3. Plan six meals a day the night before.
  4. Write up at least one blog entry.
  5. Go to the gym, or if I don’t go to the gym due to inclement weather, perform body-weight exercises at home.
  6. Get to work before 7:30 AM
  7. Spend time talking individually with each child and my wife.
  8. Straighten up the front room and kitchen before bed.
  9. Review whether I met these minimum standards every night before bed.
  10. Get to bed before 11:00 PM.

Yes, I do better on 6-7 hours of sleep per night than 8+. I have a lot more energy and don’t have trouble falling asleep if I limit my hours in the bed a bit.

What are your minimum standards?

99.9%

So I’m doing laundry this weekend, and I’m washing to whites. I grab the Clorox bleach and put it in. While this may be the 100th or 1000th time I’ve done this, for some reason I notice the “kills 99.9% of known germs” on the label.

So I’m doing laundry this weekend, and I’m washing to whites. I grab the Clorox bleach and put it in. While this may be the 100th or 1000th time I’ve done this, for some reason I notice the “kills 99.9% of known germs” on the label.

I’m hoping this is a legalese because they don’t want to claim 100% and then find something impervious to bleach and get sued. I mean, there isn’t anything that can withstand a nice dosing of Clorox, is there? Is there a tenth of a percent of germs, viruses, bacteria, fungii, whatever that can take a bleach bath and laugh it off? I’m the most anti-OCS person you can meet, I utilize the 5-second rule very liberally, but I admit I’m scared of a micro-organism that can shake off Clorox and still target my immune system. I can see Plankton from SpongeBob gargling some bleach, swallowing it, then going all Popeye on my intestines. “EUGENE!!!”

My $.02 Weed

Weight Loss Progress

Well, the last two weeks have been fairly slow as far as fat loss goes. I’m down to 222 lbs now. In some way, there’s a special zen-like quality in contemplating having a weight where all three digits are the same. If I have my way, I’ll never have this experience again. The next lowest number would be 111, and the next highest 333. Both are places I’ll never go.

Well, the last two weeks have been fairly slow as far as fat loss goes. I’m down to 222 lbs now. In some way, there’s a special zen-like quality in contemplating having a weight where all three digits are the same. If I have my way, I’ll never have this experience again. The next lowest number would be 111, and the next highest 333. Both are places I’ll never go.

But what’s been most interesting to me are the small things. My goal, as I’ve stated all along, is to get fit and put on as much muscle as I can while reducing as much fat as I can. In that vein, things are going well.

  • The pants that used to fit me snugly and look pretty good when I was fatter are now getting very droopy in the butt, and I can slide them right off without unbuttoning them. Time to retire them… which is a sad thing because I think they are great pants.
  • I had to spend a long time bent over at the waist doing some work on fixtures over the weekend, and I suddenly realized partway through that I could breathe. If you haven’t been obese, you have probably never had this experience before. Most of us Big People know this as the “tying your shoes” experience: when you bend over, you have to fully exhale and can get nothing but shallow breaths as you tie your shoes. I was able to breathe deeply the whole time. It was nice to recognize I wasn’t out of breath and light-headed while hunched over.
  • I didn’t care about carrying in all the baggage on my family’s vacation. In fact, it was a pleasant workout, and the only part I didn’t like was the cold. I wasn’t breathing hard — despite the 1500 foot altitude difference — and lugging those heavy bags back and forth for a half-dozen trips didn’t leave me tired and worn out.
  • One of the Christmas presents I received was one of those “Iron Gym” doohickies, as seen on TV. The thing where you hang it from your doorframe and do chin-ups. Well, I can do two full chin-ups now. Months ago, I couldn’t even do one.
  • The Wii Fit says I’m only 9 pounds away from my goal today, as opposed to twenty-five pounds a few months ago.

Hey, in the pursuit of personal motivation, the small accomplishments matter. I haven’t lost thirty pounds… I’ve lost five pounds six times.

Back from vacation; Blog-A-Day challenge

So I’m finally back from vacation. I have a HUGE backlog of email to catch up on, and a new challenge for myself: blog a day.

Sure, some of the entries will be short, but I want to keep my thoughts up-to-date and record my progress on various goals throughout the year. So here’s #1 for the year!

So I’m finally back from vacation. I have a HUGE backlog of email to catch up on, and a new challenge for myself: blog a day.

Sure, some of the entries will be short, but I want to keep my thoughts up-to-date and record my progress on various goals throughout the year. So here’s #1 for the year!

The Right Way To Deal With The RIAA?

Several years ago, the RIAA — Recording Industry Association of America — launched a massive wave of lawsuits against people sharing copyrighted recordings without authorization. By the tens of thousands, “John Doe” lawsuits brought anonymous file-sharers into the spotlight, with routine settlements paid by the Does to the tune of thousands of dollars.

Several years ago, the RIAA — Recording Industry Association of America — launched a massive wave of lawsuits against people sharing copyrighted recordings without authorization. By the tens of thousands, “John Doe” lawsuits brought anonymous file-sharers into the spotlight, with routine settlements paid by the Does to the tune of thousands of dollars.

As part of this process, the RIAA routinely sends tens of thousands of “takedown notices” to internet providers. The letter usually indicates that property owned by some studio has been found shared, with an IP address and time-stamp that the infringing file was found on a client’s computer. The ISP is instructed to either remove the offending material or the network access of the person who shared the file, and if they do not do so the lawyer will sue the ISP itself for non-compliance with the DMCA.

I’ve long thought the “takedown provision” of the DMCA — Digital Millenium Copyright Act, passed in 1998 — was an onerous burden on ISPs. That is, to ensure an ISP was treated as a “safe harbor” and not subject to getting sued themselves, they were required to disable the network services or web sites of copyright infringers on their networks. There’s a real and profound cost to this kind of compliance, and passing the cost of compliance on to the customers of the ISP is, IMHO, not the right way to go about it.

The cost of pursuing copyright infringement should rightfully be passed to the party claiming infringement: the copyright owner.

One small ISP in Louisiana is trying to get copyright holders to pay for their policing services.

The moment I read this story, I went “Eureka! That’s it!”. For the cost of pursuing and disabling the services of alleged infringers, an ISP should be compensated by the copyright holder. The expectation should be that the recording industry can prosecute the infringer and recoup these costs from the person who’s infringing, right?

I think this may be the perfect solution, allowing ISPs to keep their network access costs competitive while allowing copyright holders to protect their assets. What do you think?

happy holidays all

Hope everyone has weathered all the snow well. Well wishes to all whatever holiday you may or may not be celebrating

Hope everyone has weathered all the snow well. Well wishes to all whatever holiday you may or may not be celebrating

Celebrate with me!

I’ve been out of town the past few weeks, but had a milestone to celebrate.

With my weight at 224 pounds this morning, I am officially no longer “obese” according to the Body Mass Index. Still have about 30 pounds to go to get where I want to be, but there it is. I’m just overweight now! Woot!

I’ve been out of town the past few weeks, but had a milestone to celebrate.

With my weight at 224 pounds this morning, I am officially no longer “obese” according to the Body Mass Index. Still have about 30 pounds to go to get where I want to be, but there it is. I’m just overweight now! Woot!

Arthur Levin Quote

Quote of the day:

“Whatever you give a woman, she will make greater. If you give her sperm, she’ll give you a baby If you give her a house, she’ll give you a home. If you give her groceries, she’ll give you a meal. If you give her a smile, she’ll give you her heart. She multiplies and enlarges what is given to her.

Quote of the day:

“Whatever you give a woman, she will make greater. If you give her sperm, she’ll give you a baby If you give her a house, she’ll give you a home. If you give her groceries, she’ll give you a meal. If you give her a smile, she’ll give you her heart. She multiplies and enlarges what is given to her.

“So, if you give her any crap, be ready to receive a ton of shit.” –Arthur Levin

Already Problems with Obama

President-elect Obama has chosen a HUD secretary. President-elect Obama said HUD is essential in the effort to stem the mortgage crisis, which “not only shakes the foundation of our economy, but the foundation of the American Dream.”

President-elect Obama has chosen a HUD secretary. President-elect Obama said HUD is essential in the effort to stem the mortgage crisis, which “not only shakes the foundation of our economy, but the foundation of the American Dream.”

I tried searching through all my previous posts to find my diatribe on the fallacy of the U.S. housing situation. I could have sworn I went off on this sometime during 2008. Without repeating myself, let me summarize. The linking of ‘owning a home’ and the ‘American dream’ is an enormous fallacy. It is a financial marketing ploy that was irrationally grown by the detente of Wall Street and the U.S. Government. Look at where it’s gotten us. It seems there have been two major blowups this past year – Wall Street and the housing market.

Telling people that owning a home is the American dream puts a dangerous ideology in their head. The American dream should be having the freedom to choose a career and domestic path that allows each one of us the ability to find our own happiness. To the contrary, doing what it takes to move into a home, go way into credit debt, and have banks swoop up and package together all our little mortgage deals that eventually get shipped overseas so that foreign nations own 20% of our housing market is not what I would consider to be the American dream. It’s turned out to be a nightmare.

My problem with Obama is that he’s already not using his head. He’s pandering to the existing infrastructure of fallacy. I would like to hear Obama say that owning a home is nice but it’s not necessary to lead a full and happy life. I would like to hear Obama say that responsibility starts with the application of diligence, personal accountability and working to protect others in your family. I would like to hear Obama say that eliminating personal debt and executing a habit of good household finance is most important.

Friends don’t let friends get over-leveraged.