FMC: The Nature of MLM

I’ve been thinking for a long time that I need to write a series of very important things I’ve learned over my lifetime. Almost every day for the last year, some concept has occurred to me that would be good for my kids to know so they can avoid making the same mistakes I’ve made, or seen others close to me make.

In that vein, here’s my first topic!

For My Children: The Nature of Multi-Level Marketing Companies

I’ve been thinking for a long time that I need to write a series of very important things I’ve learned over my lifetime. Almost every day for the last year, some concept has occurred to me that would be good for my kids to know so they can avoid making the same mistakes I’ve made, or seen others close to me make.

In that vein, here’s my first topic!

For My Children: The Nature of Multi-Level Marketing Companies

For a moment, think about what your average shopping experience is like. What’s your process? I can’t talk about yours, but I can talk about mine.

For me, the process typically can start in one of two ways: 1. I desire something because it’s something I already know would satisfy me in some way. Food, shelter, clothing, warmth, a TV, a new hard drive to move data at my work, whatever. I may not know the specific exact thing that I want, but I know I want something that does a thing for me. 2. I desire something because it’s new. There’s a lot more detail to it — new feature, new price point, totally new thing, etc. — but it’s the new-ness and the timing of the purchase is important.

Now imagine you hear about or see a certain product. It serves a need for you of some sort, and it may not have been something you’ve seen before. You make the decision to purchase it. You like it so much, you buy something else of the same brand, and again have a good experience. This is the heart of brand loyalty, and there are many, many ethical companies that purposefully try to build that type of customer loyalty through superior products, advertising, image, etc.

There’s a fine line, of course. What if the product is crap but has a great marketing campaign? What if it’s a good product, but abuses its workers in some way? What if a company pioneered a product or service, but now some other company is producing a similar product at a lower cost? What if that new company is undercutting their competition in a completely ethical way? What if they are doing so unethically?

These are good questions to ask yourself to inform your purchasing decisions. As I often tell my kids, “Question everything. Then question your questions to discover if there are other questions you should have asked instead.” It’s very important to always question what you are told or read.

Even what you read here, from me.

That may be a topic for another post on another day, perhaps, but is not the thrust of what I want to discuss today. I want to talk about “direct marketing”. Direct marketing occurs when someone you already know in some way advertises a product and/or service to you. It’s also often called “affinity marketing” or “direct sales”, but many companies give their own special name for it.

There is, of course, a spectrum of direct marketing approaches and products for sale, from personal hygiene products to jewelry to financial services to sex toys. It’s truly dizzying. Direct Marketing allows companies to build product loyalty through word-of-mouth. Some times the products are worth the price of this method of marketing, others not.

What matters for the purpose of this little discussion, though, is their FOCUS.

Inevitably, at some point in your early adulthood, someone will try to invite you to some sort of direct marketing seminar. I won’t tell you not to go! Instead, I encourage you to go. But leave all your cash, checkbook, and credit cards at home. If possible, leave even your identification at home. At some point in the seminar they will try to convince you to sign something, purchase something, or whatever.

For this first experience, I want you to practice saying, “no” in the mirror.

Seriously.

Look yourself in the mirror and mouth the word, “no” several times. You want to get used to it.

Practice asking yourself oddball questions aloud, and answer “no” to yourself. “Do you love your family?” “No.” “Do you like good food?” “No, I don’t.” “If you could make a million dollars in the next thirty seconds by saying ‘yes’, would you do it?” “No, I won’t.”

The more you might possibly want to say “yes” to a question, the more important it is to say no. You’re not going to lie; you’re practicing this to avoid being manipulated.

Then go to the meeting with your “friend”. Be sure to have your own transportation; do not rely on someone that already is purchasing and/or selling the product! Do not take up a pen. Do not pull out cash. Do not answer “yes” to anything. Do not sign anything. Keep your hands in your lap. If it really seems like a good product — and more importantly, if it’s an ethical company — there will always be an opportunity say yes some other day. Don’t be deceived by false timing propositions like, “If you don’t do this tonight, you’re going to pay more later!” There’s always another sale later. If the product is good enough, it or one like it will be available later. Trust me on this part.

Once you come back from the presentation — once again, don’t agree to anything while you’re there! — evaluate the merits of the presentation, and ask yourself this one question:

“Did they focus on selling me a product? Or did they focus on recruiting ME to sell product?”

If a salesperson is trying to sell me a product, it will be worth evaluating and comparing to similar products or services. It may be overpriced; if so, buy something else. It may be high or low quality; determine if it’s worth purchasing based on those merits. Verify that their product seems to be ethical. If it’s something that ostensibly holds resale value, verify for yourself that the used market for the product or service increases in value; if it decreases in value, but you still want it, perhaps you could obtain it used and save some money? If you buy it new, are you paying extra simply because you are the first to have the thing?

You may end up a satisfied customer of a new product or service. Do your research, and heck, you might end up saving money and improving your quality of life. It’s important to be open-minded to new things.

But then there’s the dark side.

If that salesperson is trying to recruit you to also be a sales person for that thing in the presentation, you should avoid that thing with all the power you possess. Ethical businesses do not thrive by recruiting new people to pay into their company in some way. That is the behavior of predatory companies, and those who tread as close as they legally can to being a “pyramid scheme”, while not actually doing anything strictly illegal.

Pyramid schemes are notorious. The simplest of them were popular several decades ago. You receive an envelope containing a ten-dollar bill, a list of names, and a promise: Send five ten-dollar bills to five people you know, and to the five people on the list, crossing off certain names as you do so. If you do this, the letter promises, you will soon receive many thousands of dollars from people doing likewise. It sounds like magic, and for those who received such letters early on — high in the “pyramid” — it was enormously profitable. For the cost of a hundred dollars, you could get many times the return. And if every time you receive such a letter from someone else in the chain, you repeat the process, you are promised to continue compounding your money.

Such schemes are illegal now. You can go to jail for participating in them. The simple reason is mathematics. Any process that doubles itself with each iteration soon will number more iterations than there are atoms in the entire universe. With a finite population, you simply run out of people willing to participate in the chain. When you run out of people willing to send money to others in the list, the process falls apart, and you are left with a HUGE number of people that sent money, but never received any. All it does is shuffle money around, typically landing the largest portion of the pot in the hands of the guy who started the scam in the first place. Those people left holding the bag at the end of the chain typically don’t lose very much individually, but because so many people lost that bit, it represents an enormous drain on society as a whole. As a matter of public financial safety, we discourage the practice.

Mostly we do this because those who start such scams are usually people whom we really don’t want to end up with a lot of money: criminals. Those who’s first impulse is to figure out how to cheat society out of the products of other people’s labors rather than earning it honestly themselves.

And that’s the problem when you get home from that seminar at which you steadfastly said, “no”, refused to pick up a pen, refused to agree to anything that was presented to you. You’ve determined what their focus is: was it sales of a product? Or was it recruitment of more sales people?

If the latter, steer far away. It is the modern incarnation of that legendary postal chain mail from decades ago. It works for those near the top of the pyramid, but if you were to sign up, if you were to pay a $500 “signup fee”, or “marketing bundle purchase”, or “sales starter pack”, or whatever they choose to call it… you will know that the only way you will ever see money is if someone else is left holding the bag. Eventually, such a direct marketing approach must inevitably, mathematically fail. You cannot recruit everyone on the planet to sell these things.

The numbers bear it out. On average, some 97% of people who sign up for such “new” marketing schemes never sell enough to recoup their initial investment. The only ones making money are the 3% who are hard-working enough — or is it, perhaps, “unethical enough” — to willfully, repeatedly, with full knowledge of the devastated lives and lost money in their wake, continue to peddle their recruitment seminars indefinitely.

Do you really want to be one of those people? Callous enough to know that 97 out of every 100 people you talk to will utterly fail attempting to recruit others, and that their investment is simply wasted as part of the endless money-churning effort lying behind such pyramid schemes?

It’s up to you. As for me, if the answer to that question ever comes back that they want to sell me stuff just so that I can sell it to other people, I turn around and run the other way. I want nothing of such unethical business practices, knowing that the only way I can make money is to prey on the young, the gullible, and the desperate.

No thanks.

Blendtec vs. Vita-mix

We burn through blenders within a year or two, including a $150 Ninja among others. Looking at higher-end, long-warranty blenders, there are really only two choices in the USA today: Blendtec & Vita-mix. We ended up buying a Blendtec. Here’s why.

* “Will It Blend” videos. Duh. Huge appeal for that reason alone.
* Broad base, easy to clean.

We burn through blenders within a year or two, including a $150 Ninja among others. Looking at higher-end, long-warranty blenders, there are really only two choices in the USA today: Blendtec & Vita-mix. We ended up buying a Blendtec. Here’s why.

* “Will It Blend” videos. Duh. Huge appeal for that reason alone. * Broad base, easy to clean. * Dishwasher-safe jar (Vita-mix specifically says it’s not dishwasher-safe) * Blendtec is in Utah and I used to fly my model helicopter across the street from them in Orem. It’s how I first heard about them, asking a heli-buddy, “Hey, there’s a blender company in Utah? Who knew!” * Blade will never dull ‘cuz it’s already dull. Vita-mix stuff you have to send in for a replacement set every so often, or get blades sharpened. * Tom Dickson is a blending god. * Blendtec makes hot soups a little faster than a Vita-mix due to the more-powerful motor. From where I sit, the difference isn’t huge, but hey, it’s there. * Dull blade means no more cutting my fingers cleaning the thing. Of course, both companies recommend you not bother scraping; just run the blender with some warm water and a drop of dish soap, and it cleans itself. * Blending glowsticks. * One-piece construction of the jar, no taking it apart for the dishwasher. * 90-ounce jar. Doesn’t come bigger than that. With a family of six, that’s important: I can do eight 8-ounce smoothies in one go. * Short jar. Fits under the counter. I understand Vita-mix now offers a “compact” model with the same feature. * No plunger required. * Nine seconds to make nut butters with the Twister jar, compared to several minutes in the Vita-mix and Blendtec standard jars. We have the Wild Side; Twister’s on my to-buy list! * Eight year warranty. I realize that Vita-mix also offers an 8-year warranty on some of its models, but damn. If you figure we spend $50 a year on blenders — on average, given how frequently we burn them up — we’re saving money. * It can blend a freaking iPhone and keep coming back for more. * Programmed, set-it-and-forget-it buttons on the “cheap” model (you have to buy the highest-end Vita-mix for this feature)

So far we’ve used it to create a bunch of smoothies. We’ll see how much we like it years from now!

Unconditional Love

The “feeling” of love is largely out of your control; you can no more choose to feel love for someone without an action than you can choose to feel pain, hunger, or misery. The only love over which you have any control is love as an action: choosing to include someone in your life.

The “feeling” of love is largely out of your control; you can no more choose to feel love for someone without an action than you can choose to feel pain, hunger, or misery. The only love over which you have any control is love as an action: choosing to include someone in your life. In that sense, the idea of “Unconditional Love” is responsible for an enormous amount of destructive, abusive, and codependent behavior. It should be abandoned.

Love must be conditional. The conditions, however, don’t include understanding or agreeing with someone. It’s just one condition: that the other person does not mentally, emotionally, or physically abuse you. If a person cannot abide by that one simple rule, you may want feel love for them, but you must not keep them in your life (love as an action) or you will suffer on their behalf.

In an emotional sense, “unconditional love” is meaningless because you can’t choose to feel love. And in an action-verb sense, love must have that one condition. Otherwise, you are positioning yourself as a martyr, suffering endlessly for the sins of someone else. And as far as I know, in the Judeo-Christian tradition, only One Man was ever required to do that.

Even this atheist can tell you putting yourself in that position is probably a bad idea.

Management Confusion

The automated system was malfunctioning. Despite cutting-edge technological mechanisms for passive detection of and active response to frequently-changing usage patterns, it simply had not been able to cope with ongoing changes. Debates raged on email threads as to how to respond. Some proposed simplifying the system; they were derided for the quantity of user input required and the probability of escalating cost when users failed to take appropriate steps. Others proposed increasing the number of monitors in use to allow for potential uses that had not been considered when the system was designed, and were in turn derided for the additional complexity and cost to institute such a system.

The automated system was malfunctioning. Despite cutting-edge technological mechanisms for passive detection of and active response to frequently-changing usage patterns, it simply had not been able to cope with ongoing changes. Debates raged on email threads as to how to respond. Some proposed simplifying the system; they were derided for the quantity of user input required and the probability of escalating cost when users failed to take appropriate steps. Others proposed increasing the number of monitors in use to allow for potential uses that had not been considered when the system was designed, and were in turn derided for the additional complexity and cost to institute such a system. Eventually, after the furor died down, the discussions ended, feelings were hurt and many excellent and complicated solutions considered, the horde of nay-sayers and optimists, all with a say in the outcome, settled on a solution. “Do what you think best,” they instructed the solitary facilities engineer.

So he uninstalled the motion-detecting systems, and installed a light switch.

Solution for blocking telemarketers

I’m wondering about solutions available to block incoming telemarketer calls, particularly technology solutions.

I am currently a Comcast residential subscriber (phone/internet/cable) receiving at least two inbound calls a day from telemarketers.

I’m wondering about solutions available to block incoming telemarketer calls, particularly technology solutions.

I am currently a Comcast residential subscriber (phone/internet/cable) receiving at least two inbound calls a day from telemarketers.

I registered with the National Do Not Call Registry. I ask the inbound telemarketers to remove us from their call list, but they laugh, and then keep calling. Asking nicely and depending on governmental non-enforcement doesn’t work.

I got in touch with Comcast to find out about technology solutions available to block incoming calls, since we only use the home phone for outgoing calls, as everyone in the house uses their cell as primary phone. My goal was to have Comcast activate a block for ALL incoming calls EXCEPT for a few specific numbers I could personally add to a safe list.

Comcast said this wasn’t possible.

Comcast’s best available solution was to initiate an Anonymous Call Rejection (block all anonymous calls), use a Selective Call Rejection (for up to 12 discreet numbers), and to revisit the National Do Not Call Registry.

Gee, thanks so much, Comcast. 12 numbers? Really? There’s one college telemarketer which calls from random numbers each time, varying up its number so that it can’t be blocked. And Anonymous Call Rejection won’t do the trick because I can see most of these inbound marketing calls have particular identities and are not simply ‘out of area’.

Wondering if anyone in the Barnson circle has another solution?

Synthesizer Guidance

What would those of you with interest in this area recommend for me? I have a couple of MIDI keyboard controllers, one as part of an M-Audio Venom. What I need now are some more sampled sounds–strings, piano, etc. to use with my band. The most important thing is cost, so I’m looking pretty much at vintage stuff.

What would those of you with interest in this area recommend for me? I have a couple of MIDI keyboard controllers, one as part of an M-Audio Venom. What I need now are some more sampled sounds–strings, piano, etc. to use with my band. The most important thing is cost, so I’m looking pretty much at vintage stuff. I’m leaning towards a Roland JV-1080, but realize I know almost nothing about this stuff. Any recommendations?

Calling Out

My middle daughter, Sydney, age 7, was being bullied in her new class. She responded by writing a song called Believe In Yourself. She wrote the lyrics and melody all by herself.

I found it catchy enough that I came up with some chords.

My middle daughter, Sydney, age 7, was being bullied in her new class. She responded by writing a song called Believe In Yourself. She wrote the lyrics and melody all by herself.

I found it catchy enough that I came up with some chords.

I liked that enough that I bought a bass for my wife and a drum set for my oldest son. Then we formed a band, Calling Out. That was five months ago.

Last week we performed Believe In Yourself on the local high school stage, in front of a mosh pit of elementary school girls. I posted it on Facebook, but since I’m not sure the barnson.org crew are all connected to me there, I wanted to post it here as well.

My kids really want to reach 500 views (modest, right?), so if you like it, don’t be shy about sharing it.

Believe In Yourself

Gun Control

Let’s get some good ole barnson.org discussion going! Let’s discuss gun control. I know Matt & Ben have strong, differing views on this, so we should be able to get some good discourse going….

My views are that I agree that in a perfect world. they’re be no reason for guns, guns are primarily used to kill people, and we should get rid of guns. If you want to hunt, use a bow and arrow or muzzle-loader and give the prey a chance.

Let’s get some good ole barnson.org discussion going! Let’s discuss gun control. I know Matt & Ben have strong, differing views on this, so we should be able to get some good discourse going….

My views are that I agree that in a perfect world. they’re be no reason for guns, guns are primarily used to kill people, and we should get rid of guns. If you want to hunt, use a bow and arrow or muzzle-loader and give the prey a chance. However, we don’t live in a perfect world. We live in an amazing country where w’eve achieved an amazing level of safety and prosperity (on average, there are third-world conditions in many places in the US, but they don’t vote, so they don’t matter, right?). So people tend to forget about the bad people out there, both in our neighborhoods and in Washington DC. But the difference between our great society here in the US and regression into a Mad Max situation is slimmer than most realize. And when civilization breaks down, guns become necessary for protection, simply because they’ve been let out of Pandora’s box. The other guys *will* have them, so we need them too. You can’t unlearn technology, and the making of guns is easy now (you can do it by 3D printer!).

Or government is trending towards taking more and more power and worrying less and less about us little people, so I *do* believe we should own guns to hedge against a power grab one day. And anyone who thinks an armed populace can’t withstand the US military isn’t paying attention to Afghanistan.

As long as they can’t prevent criminals from owning gins (which they can’t) and as long as we have cronies in the government (we do), we need gins to protect ourselves from those who would use them against us. Matt has provided stats that show that places where guns are encouraged, crime falls, and where guns are banned, crime rises. Living in a fantasy world doesn’t make you safer.

Armed Citizens Don’t Count

Recently, Mother Jones published a widely-circulated study suggesting that armed citizens have never stopped any mass shootings in the USA. It’s important to know how these things are counted, though. If the shooting doesn’t boast a sufficient number of deaths — at least four dead — then it just doesn’t count. That’s a lot of mass shootings that just don’t count as such.

Let’s take a look at what else doesn’t count.

Recently, Mother Jones published a widely-circulated study suggesting that armed citizens have never stopped any mass shootings in the USA. It’s important to know how these things are counted, though. If the shooting doesn’t boast a sufficient number of deaths — at least four dead — then it just doesn’t count. That’s a lot of mass shootings that just don’t count as such.

Let’s take a look at what else doesn’t count.

  • The San Antonio Theater Shooting doesn’t count because the armed citizen who stopped it was an off-duty cop, hired security for the restaurant, and despite multiple rounds fired only one person besides the shooter died.
  • The Trolley Square shooting doesn’t count as an armed citizen stopping it because he was also an off-duty cop.
  • The Clackamas Mall shooting doesn’t count because the armed citizen never actually fired his weapon.
  • The Santa Clara shooting doesn’t count because an armed citizen prevented it from reaching the required minimum of four victims.
  • The Frontier Middle School shooting doesn’t count because the teacher wrestled the shooter’s own gun from him.
  • The Pearl High School shooting doesn’t count because the body count was only three when the vice-principal stopped him, and the vice-principal never fired a shot.
  • The Appalachian School shooting doesn’t count because the body count was, again, too low, plus students “tackled” the shooter. The fact two other students were pointing loaded firearms at the shooter? Doesn’t count.
  • The Tyler Texas shooting doesn’t count because the armed citizen was the only one killed when he returned fire. Insufficient body count, and really, the citizen got what was coming to him for getting involved, right? He doesn’t count.
  • The Arvada, Colorado shooting doesn’t count because it took place in two separate places, with individual body counts of two apiece. Plus, the shooter killed himself; the fact he had already been severely wounded by an armed parishioner doesn’t count.
  • The Tucson, Arizona (“Gabby Giffords”) shooting doesn’t count because even though one of the citizens who tackled the shooter was armed, he didn’t draw the firearm.
  • The Aurora, CO “Church Shooting” doesn’t count because the shooter only killed one person before being killed in turn by an armed parishioner.

Mother Jones, you’re absolutely right. Armed citizens don’t stop mass murders because, well, apparently armed citizens simply don’t count.

And for my fellow armed citizens, we’ve learned an important and valuable lesson from Mother Jones. Next time:

  1. Ensure you are not a current or former police officer or military veteran. If you get involved, you won’t count. Perhaps you should just walk away.
  2. Wait until the murderer has killed at least FOUR innocent people before drawing your sidearm. If you get involved too early and save innocent lives, you won’t count.
  3. Ensure you fire at least one shot — even if it is not required to subdue the shooter — so that your tally counts.

Unfortunately for Mother Jones, I can count. There’s no way I’d stand idly by so that their counts could finally stand up to scrutiny.

Regards, Matthew P. Barnson http://barnson.org/node/1890

Source: http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31/auditing-shooting-rampage-statistics/

EDIT: A mutual friend brought up that I apparently missed an article quite similar to my blog entry. Apparently, I agree with Ann Coulter on an issue. http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-12-19.html

EDIT: I hereby license this work under the Creative Commons “Share and share alike” license. Basically, it’s yours to share, but attribute your modifications.

Sometimes People Miss The Point

Support: “Why didn’t you escalate this issue earlier?”

Me: “I don’t actually care if it’s fixed. The two points of my ticket submitted over three months ago were:
“One: To demonstrate the workaround I’m using, and

Support: “Why didn’t you escalate this issue earlier?”

Me: “I don’t actually care if it’s fixed. The two points of my ticket submitted over three months ago were: “One: To demonstrate the workaround I’m using, and “Two: To highlight the typical and spectacular inefficiency of our support model unless someone whines to Support constantly or has connections in the company. Like I’m doing right now in this meeting with our respective management teams to try to fix our support process.”

Support: “But you should have escalated it. I’d have taken care of it right away.”

Me: “…?”